Dear Friends,
Archive for the 'UFT' Category
Paul Feingold, teacher, leader, activist, 1945 – 2017
Published July 1, 2017 Chapter Leaders , UFT , United Federation of Teachers ClosedTags: obituary
NEW ACTION AND MORE SWEEP ALL SEVEN HIGH SCHOOL EXECUTIVE BOARD SEATS
Published June 14, 2016 New Action , UFT , UFT elections , UFT Executive Board ClosedTags: Jia Lee, MORE Caucus
NEW ACTION AND MORE SWEEP ALL SEVEN HIGH SCHOOL EXECUTIVE BOARD SEATS
The announcement on May 27, 2016 that Jia Lee, New Action/MORE presidential candidate won 21% of the citywide vote was a terrific victory, especially since this was her first run for the position. Michael Mulgrew won with a total of 76%. While a solid victory for Unity Caucus it is interesting to note that in the last UFT election (2013) he received 84% and in 2010 his vote totaled 91%.
Clearly, the fact that Mulgrew was not cross endorsed by New Action, as he was in 2013 and 2010 was a big factor in his decreased vote as President. The total vote for Mulgrew was 39,175 and for Jia it was 10,743
Our major goal in this election was to win the high school division. We did!
Several significant factors characterized this election:
- New Action/MORE won all seven high school seats by 2,292 to 2,077. Our candidates: Kuljit Ahluwalia, David Garcia-Rosen, Arthur Goldstein, Ashraya Gupta, Jonathan Halabi, Marcus McArthur, Michael Schirtzer will meet as they begin to serve as executive board members. This victory continues the legacy of New Action’s role in the high schools, Beginning in the mid 1980’s, New Action dominated the high school division. After 1985 when Michael Shulman won the Academic HS Vice Presidency, New Action has either won or played the determining role in high school elections. Only after Unity Caucus rammed through UFT constitutional changes did Unity win the HS Vice Presidency. Divisions no longer elect their VP’s – instead all officers are elected by the membership at large, thus guaranteeing no division can elect their own representative.
- This election cycle, it was New Action/MORE that won the high schools. It could not have been done if the caucuses ran separately. The combined strength of New Action and MORE not only secured the high schools but increased our vote totals in all divisions. For the two caucuses, this was the first attempt to turn the direction of the union around. Our major joint campaign literature- featuring Jia Lee and the New Action/MORE program- was distributed to 60,000 UFT members. In addition, New Action and MORE put out tens of thousands of additional pieces of election material to the schools. In future elections, an increased focus on the intermediate and middle schools may turn that division to New Action and MORE.
- Literally, hundreds of Chapter Leaders agreed to distribute New Action/MORE literature in their schools. We were very successful in having our members and supporters in the schools get out literature not only in their own schools but to surrounding schools. New Action played a major role in having our retiree members distribute in over 300 schools.
- The total vote went up considerably from the previous election. In 2013 only 18% of in-service members voted. The three caucuses—New Action, MORE, and Unity made a larger vote turnout a priority. This was also accomplished. In 2013 the total vote was approximately 42,000. This election the number was 52,000.
New Action and MORE have a real challenge going forward. The UFT led by Unity Caucus has ignored so many issues facing our members. We have an obligation to put forward our program on behalf of the entire membership. Our election commitment was to activate and mobilize UFT members for a better contract in 2018. Immediately, we have to protect members and Chapter Leaders from abusive administrators. We are committed to opposing the use of standardized tests to evaluate teachers. We must demand the permanent placement of ATR’s and putting a stop to the practice of arbitrary and capricious discontinuance of probationary members. We will continue to support the Opt-Out movement. We must fight for real union democracy. We do not have any confidence that Unity Caucus has these issues as their priority. Most importantly, we must foster membership involvement at the school level. UFT members must know and feel their union has “their backs.”
For Sensible Placement of Counselors and Social Workers in Excess
Published June 8, 2016 New Action , New York CIty Department of Education , NYC , UFT , UFT Executive Board ClosedTags: Guidance Counselors, School Social Workers
Guidance Counselors and Social Workers in excess are being rotated once a month. In many schools administrators can find or create no short-term counseling assignments – and leave counselors who want to work sitting idle. This may not be from administrative malice; it might just be the result of a stupid system.
New Action, with counselors, considered forms of relief that we might pursue. Extending the period of rotation to a full semester or full year seemed like the simplest, easiest to achieve step towards providing relief.
We drafted a resolution, proposed it to the leadership. They edited it. (They added language to indicate that they have already been pursuing this with the Department of Education. They certainly have – but to this point it has not been public and has not been part of the conversation in the organization as a whole).
And this Monday, June 6, 2016, it was on the UFT Executive Board agenda. Matt Ravick, a counselor in excess, spoke at the open mike about his experiences. And later LeRoy Barr motivated the resolution and Jonathan Halabi of New Action spoke in support. It passed unanimously.
What of other groups being treated unfairly by the Department of Education? This resolution does not help them directly. But 1) anytime we show solidarity with our colleagues, we are all uplifted, and 2) if this happens it will be a crack in the system of rotation, making it easier to make progress for other groups of members.
There is no contradiction between seeking immediate relief for a couple of titles while standing against the system that flooded the ATR pool in the first place. What changes need to happen? An end to short-term rotation for all titles. Placement of ATRs into vacancies in their district with their agreement. A return to unit costing (current funding system forces principals to consider experience as a negative factor in staffing). An end to school closings. A freeze on hiring in a license until all ATRs in that license are assigned. And a return to seniority transfers and an end to the “open market” hiring system.
On Monday we took a very small step in the right direction, but one that our Guidance Counselor in excess and Social Worker in excess colleagues will appreciate.
FOR SENSIBLE PLACEMENT OF COUNSELORS AND SOCIAL WORKERS IN EXCESS
WHEREAS, there are UFT Guidance Counselors and Social Workers in the ATR pool; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Education rotates those Guidance Counselors and Social Workers each month; and
WHEREAS, schools have counseling and social work needs, but these require professionals who are assigned for a longer period of time; and
WHEREAS, the United Federation of Teachers values the dignity of all our members; therefore
WHEREAS, the United Federation of Teachers have consistently argued to the Department of Education that the current rotation system is not appropriate for Guidance Counselors and Social Workers due to the nature of their work and have advocated for assignments to schools for longer periods of time such that they can be a tremendous benefit to the schools and students of New York City; be it
RESOLVED that the United Federation of Teachers will work with the Department of Education to change the rotation system so that Guidance Counselors and Social Workers in the ATR pool will be assigned to schools for a sufficient period so that they can continue to serve the children of NYC.