Highs and Lows: A Year In Review

Summer has finally arrived. After a ridiculously long school year filled with ups and downs for UFT members, we finally made it. This is a brief, incomplete review of the highs and lows we experienced this past year.

Highs

1. The Fix Tier 6 Campaign (age)

Synopsis: The retirement age to receive an unreduced pension was lowered from 30/63 to 30/58. This shaves five years off retirement for Tier 6 members who started in their late 20s or younger. This will help thousands of UFT members as they get to retire earlier without taking a financial shellacking. To a lesser extent, the age change also helps educators who began their teaching careers at 29-32 years old. Under 30/63, a 29 year old just starting out in the profession would have had to work until 63 to avoid a penalty to their pension contributions. Now they can retire at 59, assuming they didn’t take extended time off at any point. Someone who starts out at 32 could hypothetically retire at 62 (instead of 63) without incurring a hit to their pension. Educators positively impacted by this save their time and their money. Don’t let anybody minimize this. 30/58 is a big win, regardless of how we got there or what other unions have.

2. The Class Size Law

Synopsis: 60% of all NYC schools had to be in compliance with the class size law this past school year. Teachers and students throughout the city are benefitting from more manageable classroom settings, as well as increased engagement through individualized and small group attention.

Beyond the obvious educational advantages that come with the class size mandate is something just as important – job security. Student enrollment is freefalling and shows no signs of stopping, as studies reveal that NYC schools are at risk of losing 150,000 students over the next ten years. Schools are already feeling the pressure. The Citizens Budget Commission announced that, “The number of school-age children enrolled in NYC public schools has fallen by 163,046 between school years 2014-15 and 2023-24.” Reducing class sizes keeps educators out of the jackpot. Without the class size law, we’d likely face mass-excessing throughout the city and possibly even job losses.

3. Foundation Aid Formula

Synopsis: There was a change in the Foundation Aid formula, which will increase the amount of funding for ELLs, homeless, and foster students. As a result, NYC schools are expected to receive nearly $900 million in additional funding. The update to the funding formula was long overdue and certainly helps NYC schools, “where more than 150,000 students experienced homelessness last year and one in every six students is learning English as a new language.” The Foundation Aid formula hadn’t been updated since 2007.

4. Hold Harmless

Synopsis: Hold harmless is an essential school funding policy that began during Covid. Hold harmless ensures that schools maintain their budgets despite shrinking student enrollment. Michael Elsen-Rooney of Chalkbeat explains, “Schools get their budgets in the spring for the coming academic year based on their projected enrollment. Then in the middle of the school year, money is either added or taken away from that initial allocation based on the number of students who actually showed up.” Since 2020, schools have been keeping the money initially allotted to them despite enrollment dropoffs. According to Chancellor Samuels, that trend will continue next school year.

Lows

1. The Fix Tier 6 Campaign (pension contributions)

Synopsis: Pension contribution rates for Tier 6 NYCTRS and NYSTRS members remain unchanged while other Tier 6 workers received slightly reduced pension contributions.

The new pension contribution rates for other Tier 6 members are as follows:

$45,000 and under: 3% (same)

$45,001-$55,000: 3% (down from 3.5%)

$55,001-$75,000: 3% (down from 4.5%)

$75,001-$100,000: 4% (down from 5.75%)

$100,001-$125,000: 5.25% (down from 6%)

$125,001 and up: 5.75% (down from 6%)

The money saved doesn’t amount to much (although members making between $55,001-$100,000 benefit decently), but it doesn’t bode well that we weren’t included in the contribution decrease. Tier 6 contribution rates are astronomical. Tier 6 educators conservatively contribute $150,000 more towards pension contributions over the course of our careers than early Tier 4 members. And in many cases, that figure is modest. Imagine how much that comes out to if Tier 6 members had the chance to invest that money over the course of their careers. To be clear, this is not a knock on Tier 4 members. They deserve what they have. But it needs to be equalized. When you factor in investment opportunities, the difference could reach high six digits/low seven digits per member by the time we retire. More than half of active educators are in Tier 6.

2. The Class Size Law

Synopsis: You may be noticing a pattern. A little good, a little bad. Although the class size law has helped us immensely, it has been extended two years. 80 percent of classes throughout the city were supposed to be in compliance with the mandate next year, followed by 100 percent in 2027-28. Instead, only 70 percent of classes will have to be in compliance next year, followed by 80 percent in 2027-28, 90 percent in 2028-29, and 100 percent by 2029-2030, not counting exemptions. The delay means hundreds of millions less in funding for NYC schools and thousands fewer new teacher hires than originally promised for the upcoming school year.

3. The Federal Tax-Credit Scholarship

Synopsis: Governor Hochul has expressed her support for the federal tax-credit scholarship, a school voucher program that will rob tax money from public schools and public works in order to fund private schools. This is a blatant, anti-public school initiative that could have serious consequences. In January, Chalkbeat published an alarming piece about the school choice tax credit program. Chalkbeat reporter Lily Altavena explains, “families can donate up to $1,700 to scholarship-granting organizations and receive an equivalent tax credit back.” Allowing families to receive tax credit to financially benefit private schools reduces the amount of tax dollars that go into our communities. In fact, in 2022, Kentucky’s Supreme Court “ruled that Kentucky’s tax credit scholarship program is unconstitutional.” As Peter Greene explains, “In a tax credit scholarship program, corporations or individuals contribute money to a ‘scholarship’ fund that will pay part of some student’s tuition at a private school. The state then counts that contribution towards taxes.” In other words, tax dollars are reallocated to private schools instead of going to public schools, projects, and programs that would otherwise support our communities. You can learn more and take action to stop this attack on public schools here.

4. Abusive Administrators

Synopsis: Self-explanatory. Although we do not have data to provide us with exact numbers, the anecdotal evidence is overwhelming. If social media is any indication, educators throughout NYC are facing retaliatory, unfair, and unreasonable administrators. Granted, social media is more conducive to people who tend to vent rather than regale us with stories about glorious, flawlessly run schools with competent and compassionate leadership, so it may not be the most accurate measure, but it’s hard to ignore when tales of abusive admin continue to run rampant. There doesn’t seem to be much in the way of checks and balances. Under state law, untenured employees are considered “at will” and can be discontinued at the drop of a hat, which has been weaponized by school administrators. Principals have entirely too much power, running their schools like fiefdoms rather than academic institutions where educators are valued and treated as professionals.

It’s been a mixed bag of a year. These are just some of the broad strokes. Anyone that says everything is great isn’t telling the whole story. On the flip side, those who claim all hope is lost and that the sky is falling are being equally disingenuous. The upcoming school year will be very telling as to the future of our union. In addition to everything mentioned above, our contract expires in November 2027 and we’re still waiting on the paraprofessional RESPECT check. We must continue to work together and support each other so we can collectively improve our lot, both within our schools and in the broader union landscape. Ascension or descension. The choice is ours.

Be It Resolved… That the UFT Delegate Assembly Vote on More Resolutions

The Delegate Assembly (DA) holds monthly meetings (October-June) in which elected chapter leaders and delegates throughout the city discuss union issues. The DA is often referred to as the highest decision-making body in the UFT. At the end of each meeting, the DA votes on resolutions that usually directly impact our union. These resolutions are proposals that often center around topics such as our working conditions, political endorsements, legislative priorities, supporting social issues and other unions, and healthcare, just to name a few. The resolution period is, for all intents and purposes, when the work of the DA is supposed to get done. If the DA votes to support a resolution, that resolution is supposed to become the official stance and policy of the UFT.

The DA hit the ground running this year, voting on eight resolutions in October (one of which was deemed moot) and an additional five in November. Over the next seven months, we voted on a total of ten resolutions, only voting on one most of the time. The number of resolutions voted on by month this school year is as follows:

October – 8 (1 moot)

November – 5

December – 2

January – 2

February – 1

March – 1

April – 1

May – 1

June – 2

The massive dip since November is problematic. Many vital resolutions have been left to languish since the DA only voted on ten since December. One proposed resolution that we were unable to vote on calls for the DOE to respond to low survey scores, implement improvement plans, and enforce ethical administration of our annual school surveys. Year after year, school staff fill out these surveys, yet nothing happens to help struggling schools and chapters with subpar leadership. Imagine if our union was able to successfully convince the DOE to get involved and mediate or otherwise try to mend problems within our schools based on the annual school survey results. Members would not only feel more empowered since their voices would be heard, but perhaps some of those seemingly impossible-to-solve issues would be remedied, or at least negotiated to the point where they become tolerable.

A different resolution sought to urge the DOE and school construction to prioritize and allocate resources to schools in need of adequate Wi-Fi bandwidth, an issue many of us grapple with on a regular basis.

Another resolution proposed an adjustment to staffing in 3K and Pre-K classrooms, advocating for there to be at least two adults in every 3K and Pre-K classroom, which would greatly benefit early childhood educators and students.

There’s a resolution currently sitting ninth in the queue (not kidding) demanding a more legitimate role for educators and families who serve on C-30 committees. As we all know, the C-30 process is a complete farce and waste of time. The principal (or superintendent) hires whoever they want, regardless of the input given by the rest of the committee. The C-30 process badly needs a remodel. At this pace, we’ll never have the opportunity to push this proposal forward.

A resolution seeking human oversight and accountability regarding AI in schools – an issue that becomes more important by the second – is currently last in a long line of its lingering siblings. Alas, we wait.

There’s more, but you get the point. Thirteen resolutions untouched and ignored. Many have been sitting there for months. It’s not just about the resolutions that have been left hanging, either. Think about the ones that are never even brought up during the motion period because people are dissuaded from proposing a resolution to the following month’s agenda when they see there are a dozen others ahead of theirs.

We need to vote on more resolutions moving forward. Allotting a specific amount of time to tackle resolutions every month might help. Occasionally holding a bonus DA meeting when resolutions get badly backlogged may be another possible solution. Someone once suggested decoupling the resolution period from the President’s Report and holding multiple meetings each month, allowing us more time to vote. Whatever the solution(s) may be, we need to prioritize voting on as many resolutions as possible in the future.

And the Survey Says… We Don’t Know (But Principals Do)

Every year, students, families, and staff complete the annual school survey for their respective schools. The feedback provided is perhaps the most comprehensive way for the public to get a feel of the inner workings of a particular school. Questions about safety, facilities, and trust in leadership are just some examples of the dozens of topics covered in the annual survey.

For educators trying to decide whether they should return to their school or interview elsewhere, the public release date of the annual survey results is tantalizing. Traditionally, the data from the annual school surveys is made available to the public in early-mid August, just as Open Market is closing or has already closed. Imagine families trying to decide the best schools for their children and having to use year-old results to try to make their determination. Imagine an educator making an important, career-altering decision to change schools in July only to find out a month later that the school has plummeted over the past year and has less than stellar ratings. Imagine passing up on an offer from a school that has turned it around in the last year and is now lauded by students, families, and staff. New teachers and those definitely looking to transfer are most negatively impacted by the (lack of) timeliness with which results are made available. There have been educators who did their due diligence by researching the annual survey stats before making a decision, only to find that they had been misled. They took a job based on lofty principal ratings but later discovered that those belonged to the previous principal. The new principal had dreadful stats and turned out to be a nightmare. Our jobs are difficult enough. We shouldn’t be subjected to parsing through outdated data when making big decisions regarding our livelihoods.

For the past two years, New Action Caucus has published the survey results, with a focus on teacher-principal trust, teacher influence, and instructional leadership. However, by the time everything is published, it’s too late. Educators are locked into their positions for the upcoming school year and would only be able to leave if they are granted a release by their principal, a risky proposition to say the least, especially if they deny you.

All of this seems tremendously unfair to everyone involved, but this is the way it’s always been, so we accept it. But we shouldn’t, especially since superintendents have had access to the survey results since June 2 and principals have had access since June 3.

It makes sense that school leaders and superintendents have access to the survey results. The best of them may look at the results and hopefully reflect on what’s working and what isn’t and what they can do to improve their schools. Petty leaders may use the results for more nefarious purposes, such as targeting and tormenting their respective staffs. Regardless of what, if anything, superintendents and principals do with the information, the rest of us should be incensed that we will not have access to these very same results for another two months. The argument can easily be made that the survey data is much more imperative and time sensitive for educators, students, and families. After all, we’re the ones who must choose the best environment for ourselves and our loved ones. What benefit is it to give early access to school leadership instead of making the results publicly available to everyone? Why even keep up the facade of transparency when 99% of us are working off of year-old data?

It’s bad enough that the annual school survey results aren’t released until Open Market closes, but the situation becomes flat out unacceptable once you realize that the data is readily available to those in power, but not for the rest of us. It would be nice to know what the staff thinks of their principal or what the students think about school safety before going on that July interview. Instead, we’re left with outdated and possibly inaccurate information to help put the pieces together. We are not being treated fairly and we are not being given a sufficient opportunity to figure out our next steps.

School leaders are encouraged to review results with their staff, but how many principals actually do that? While that information may be valuable, we already know how we feel about our own schools. Moreso, the rest of the schools throughout the city would still remain a complete mystery. The annual school survey results need to be released to everybody as early as possible, not just school leaders and superintendents. Considering Open Market begins in April, the argument can be made that even early June is too long to wait. We deserve access to up-to-date information so that we have the chance to make career decisions that are best for us and our families.


Learn more about

our UFT Caucus

Content Policy

Content of signed articles and comments represents the opinions of their authors. The views expressed in signed articles are not necessarily the views of New Action/UFT.
Follow New Action – UFT on WordPress.com
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 412,121 hits