New Action – UFT

Quick Summary/Analysis:

• Strikes: We now have a pro-strike resolution approved to be on next month’s agenda, which means it’s quite likely to pass at a future DA. Matt Driscoll (MORE) motivated it, and you should take the time to read his full speech in the minutes below. I am thankful that Mulgrew called on Matt, a known opposition figure. I am also glad that, despite Unity having recently argued against our own right to strike, they did not speak out against this resolution. The difference here is that Matt’s resolution had to do with the general right to strike in the U.S., which is distinct from UFT arguing to reform the Taylor Law that prevents us from striking here in New York City. I look forward to hopefully seeing Unity expand its strike support to UFT’s own members in the future. In the meantime, this is a good move forward. Just look at what the mere threat of a strike just did for teachers in L.A.
• Contract: Mulgrew was a bit vague, but based on things he said today, it does appear that things are moving forward on contract. Might we have a tentative agreement by the end of the school year? I’m starting to think the answer is yes. Whether that contract will be worth the paper it’s printed on will be another story.
• Charters: We do still need to worry about charter school caps being raised in New York City. That’s still on the table. The High School Executive Board collaborated with Unity on a resolution presented at the end of the DA solidifying our opposition to Hochul’s move. There are other actions also happening. This needs to be on everyone’s radar.
• Curriculum: Things aren’t looking good on curriculum. I’ve gotta say, this could be a major workplace issue, and one which will hurt teachers and students. Unfortunately, it’s not a subject of collective bargaining, according to Mulgrew. Although, since we’re currently in the middle of negotiations, I do wonder why we don’t move to change that.
• Endorsements 1: The endorsements part of the DA was a farce, and based on the vote, I think that many members understand that. First, Unity used precious time in the motivation period to move the District Attorney endorsements before City Council. The DA endorsements were always going to be less controversial, which I thought was the purpose, but it turned out that two of the endorsed DA candidates were there. There’s something unsettling about Mulgrew having brought them before the endorsement – can you imagine the egg on face if we’d voted this down or contended it?
• Endorsements 2: City Council was more contentious. Ryan Bruckenthal introduced an amendment to add a missing name (Tiffany Caban). They responded that she might be in the next round and that she first should go through the process. Of course, the process is heavily flawed, monopolized by one caucus within the UFT, but I wasn’t called on to make this point. With a ‘second round’ of endorsements in mind, I’ll add that it’s not just who was omitted that was the problem. No, many of the candidates who were proposed to be endorsed were far from progressive. Some had voted for budget cuts and at least one was pro charter. A few people were allowed to speak out against and make these points, but not too many, and the Unity response here was that we should stick to the amendment. Then, the question was called for all issues before the house. If you aren’t versed in Robert’s Rules of Order, this means that the entire resolution was now going to be voted on, even though delegates had predominately only spoken about an amendment that Bruckenthal withdrew anyways.  Unity loves calling the question, but it was an odd moment to call it. Based on the results of the later vote, delegates clearly voted to end debate in part because many thought they were only voting to end debate on a withdrawn amendment. When immediately after ending the debate the entire resolution was up for a vote, a full third of delegates voted against the endorsement. This was not at all the unanimous result that Mulgrew probably wanted. Seemingly startled by the low approval, he gave an apologist argument for the ‘mistakes’ that endorsed members made last year.
• Peloton: A minor point, but UFT is doing a ‘peloton’ event. Do they have any idea how little we make? Pelotons are priced for UFT officers, not teachers. I’m a little lost here and heard from many members who felt it was out of touch. But I digress. The minutes follow.

Informal Minutes

Mulgrew: Introduces Pallotta, who did great work for us on the political side at NYSUT. NYC teacher who is retiring.

Andy Pallotta (Outgoing NYSUT President): Been a UFT member, District Rep. When we work together we do great things. Thanks for your support over the years.

Mulgrew: You will be missed.

Nationally, having conversations on gun control. Not sure what’s gonna have to happen. AFT has spoken to us, contact at NEA. Things are getting jumbled around. Thankfully good people down there.

Supreme Court: Constantly watching. Roe v Wade, what they’re doing on the other issues, overreach. If this unsettlement keeps happening, will be interesting to see what happens nationally. I know you wanted to see the Fox News Trial, but you can afford to lie with such a massive payout. Some more lawsuits.

State: Judges are done. Happy with some appointments. Seems like there’s some sort of bail compromise, but confusing because tied to housing, also important to us – difficult to live here. If we can’t increase housing stock, prices will go up.

Charter fight is not over. Not even sure how you come up with the term Zombie Charters. Not in the law. Same with expansion of charters from k-5 all the way to 12. Big thing is why are we even talking about this? Charters are half empty in NYC. NYC Charter Institute, basically Fox News, talks about waiting lists, but that doesn’t compute when schools are half empty. If you need more charters, backfill the ones you have. We have a class size law now in NY. So why would we put more charters in NYC when we need more space now? Thanks people who activated on Friday night to keep pushing. I know you aren’t hearing a lot about it, but need to understand it. If Albany doesn’t base it on the facts, kids are gonna get hurt.

Class size, three entities: CSA, DOE, UFT, not just about next year. In September, some schools will already get the reductions, based on student need. Moving on issue. Going well.

City Council / Budget Fight: City calling for more cuts. Council digging in heals. Progressive Caucus already saying they won’t approve the budget. Others as well. Appreciate that Albany sent more money to NYC, but the problem is schools still getting cut. Can the state tell the City what to do in terms of budgeting? Yes. If we have a second straight year. City Council Breakfast shortly.

Curriculum project is not going well. Lots of communication issues. Will see where that goes. Keep hearing about outside vendors, and we’re saying no.

Contract: Good governance negotiation this morning. It was constructive, moving. Money is one issue. We’re still playing with everything. Happy with colleagues in La who got 21%, so they can get their top salary up, which will help with recruitment. But, we’re now having a real problem with that too. The other issue that goes across all titles is time being wasted, autonomy being taken away, and being disrespected and having no voice. This is a national problem. Have to have this fight and have it now. When people are saying half of their work time is waste – nothing to do with why hired, that’s a massive problem.

Political landscape around education: We know who the enemies are in general, but some things are being done by us. Data Driven instruction is driving us nuts. They are now assessing the assessments – not kidding. Laughing, but no joke, this is what’s going on. And so disconnected from what’s happening to schools. Chapters just want toner for the printer, because they’re required to print so much. Schools are still submitting per session sheets – why not an app that makes it easier for us? Yesterday, there was a CAT team meeting. We’re finalizing the survey results – they’re strong. People are fed up with everything. Next week, we want a week of action of informational leafletting. ‘50% of my time is not me working for your child. The assessments are causing morale issues.’ So on Monday, we’ll send everything out to CAT teams. We’ll do a run of pre-printed leaflets. Then, from Tuesday to Friday, we want the leafletting, and we want NYC to understand that enough is enough. We want the city to understand we’re being made to waste our time. Borough Reps will pick some schools to distribute. I’ll be with the press. Money was the number one priority for members, we knew that, but this was close behind. There’s traction to move right now. So we have to move.

Secretary’s Report:

LeRoy Barr: Academic high schools awards on Friday, May 5^th. Doors open at 4:00 PM. UFT pedal pushers a virtual team Peleton riding group, April 25^th, reach out to Team High Schools (Peleton). Aids walk, Sunday May 31^st. 10^th annual 5k run, Saturday June 10^th at Coney Island.

Questions Period:

Name Missed: Question about curriculum. Y

Mulgrew: Right now it will be 15 of the school districts. All but 2 would be using HMH. We’re trying to work this out with them. This the tough part of the union. We know it’s in our interest to work with them, because it won’t work out if left to just them. But we get frustrated hearing the agendas, etc. We’ve had planning sessions, but we’re adamant on a couple of things, but we don’t have collective bargaining rights on it. We want teachers to work with teachers, masters teachers, teacher centers, career ladder – and that’s where we’re stuck. The DOE tells us they have no money, but in ten minutes I could slash millions of dollars of contracts out of the DOE – stuff that is a joke, works for no one. We also know as teachers we need to engage our students. The literacy/comprehension parts are solid, but we want to be able to fill in the other pieces. Culturally responsive instruction: we have 200 cultures we teach to NY. DOE doesn’t even seem to grasp that. Love that we live in the most diverse city in the planet, but we know that to engage our students we need to work out how we will support them. A little more positive last month than I am this month. But worth aggravation if we can get somewhere.

Jessica LaBarbera: Principal preference for possibly working remotely on curriculum days? All of the math/science depts are being told to come into the building to do virtual training.

Mulgrew: Our position is clear that it’s a waste of your time. City has said no longer support virtual work, but if you go to DOE on a Friday you see everyone is working virtually. If you really want people, treat them as professionals.

Christine Joseph: Open Market season is here. Most of my school’s teachers want to go on open market for many reasons. Are principals able to see when staff goes on open market?

Mulgrew: They can’t see it, but a principal can always call another principal. A lot of positions not there because of budget. City needs budget from state to put out their budget.

Name Missed: What is happening with the upcoming calendar for 2023-2024.

Mulgrew: Plan is it will be out by the end of this week. Or so we always hear. Keeps changing. Calendar is always tight, because the most diverse city has the most holidays. We are in one of those years where Passover and Easter are nowhere near each other. We feel we have a proposal making everyone happy – well we try, UFT has strong opinions. This has only happened twice in the last 50 years. I was around for the last one – and we had to tell everyone to love they brother and sister.

Name Missed (retiree): Last week there was a retired teachers meeting, but many of us were locked out with a glitch. We received a letter saying thank you for attending and then would be another one scheduled?

Mulgrew: Yes, another meeting is scheduled. There will need to be a series of specific meetings dealing with everything.

Matt Driscoll: For next month. Thanks LeRoy for making copies.

The resolution I’m motivating was written by Workers Strike Back and is part of a nation-wide push to demand the Supreme Court protects the right to strike.

For decades big-business has waged an unrelenting war on organized labor, Starting with the Taft-Hartley Act in 1948.  We saw state after state enact “right to work” laws designed to cripple labor unions, companies and political leaders have worked to destroy union after union,and courts continually side with corporations and bosses over workers. In 2018, the Supreme Court launched an unprecedented attack on public sector workers by reversing the Abood v. Detroit Board of Education precedent that allowed unions to require all public sector workers represented by unions in negotiations to pay dues or agency fees. In Janus v. AFSME all public sector unions in the country effectively fell under right to work rule in a blatant attempt to defund organized labor and shrink our numbers. In 2017 I worked in the UFT’s member organizing institute, knocking on the doors of hundreds of UFT members to talk about what it means to be a member of a strong union. Almost every single member I spoke to recommitted to the UFT. In the wake of this organization, and because of the hard work of rank and file, our membership actually increased after the disastrous Janus decision!

I am grateful to have a union with so many dedicated members, but the attacks I just spoke of have continued, and we need to continue to fight back. In January the Supreme Court listened to oral arguments in Glacier Northwest, Inc v International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Glacier NW is suing Teamsters Local 174 for alleged financial damages from a 2017 strike. In the 1959 San Diego Building Trades Council v Garmon Supreme Court case,  the court set the precedent that a strike protected by the NLRA preempts a company’s claims of financial loss. Glacier NW is the most aggressive anti-labor attack since Janus. 

Corporate bosses understand that the ability to strike is the strongest weapon workers in trade unions have in the struggle to maintain fair pay and safe working conditions. Glacier NW is nothing short of a direct attack on workers’ right to strike. 

Resolutions calling for national action to defend the right to strike like this have been pushed in other unions nationally, including dozens of unions and labor organizations in Seattle like UAW Local 4121, IATSE Local 15, AFGE Local 3197, and others. A similar resolution in the MLK County Labor Council, which represents more than 100,000 union members in King County, Washington, passed with 97 percent support. I call on the UFT to support our union siblings across the country in demanding that the court affirm the precedent set in 1959 protecting this basic right. We must affirm that the strike is labor’s most powerful tool in fighting against abusive bosses and a system that seeks to exploit workers for the sake of capital. 

As the resolution states “Unions are crucial bulwarks against racism, sexism, transphobia and other attacks on workers.” The right to strike is critical in maintaining the hard fought victories that protect workers from these attacks. I ask that every delegate and chapter leader here join me in standing in support of our union siblings in Teamsters Local 174.

No one speaks against. Matt asks a quick question and Mulgrew treats hostilely, saying he reminds him of an old administrator he used to have.  

Motion passes. 88% vote yes, on next month’s agenda.

Lamar Hughes: Change resolution to change 2 to 1 (district attorneys instead of city councils).

Mulgrew: Understand what you’re doing, but up to body.

78% yes.

District Attorneys:

Mary Atkinson: In support. Good candidates. For instance, Katz helped with schools who were in trailers (getting removed). Has worked with UFT. McMahon has done a lot to combat opioid crisis. Etc, etc.

Passes.

Then several DAs come up.

DA Clark: Thanks teachers. I wouldn’t be who I am without you. You shape lives each and every day. Losing a generation to violence. Need safe environments for our kids. Will continue to go to any career day. I will always be here. Will continue to fight to keep schools safe.

DA Katz: There have been three district attorneys in history of NYC. Heard the nominations before we walked in. Have been there for many fights around schools. Believe my job is to keep this borough safe. Put money into programs so that students know we care. Want our kids not to end up in court rooms to begin with. You are a huge part of that. Partnership that we feel with the UFT.

Resolution 2: City Council

Liz Perez: Moving City Council Endorsements.

Ryan Bruckenthal: Adds Tiffany Caban. She was out there trying not to cut money schools.

Mulgrew: Did she go through the process?

Name Missed: Name is not in this round, but will be in the next. We have 51 council members. What we did in this round is we took people with big primary races. Then we took  it to political action teams. Next round of endorsements in this next round.

Mulgrew: We have a process, Tiffany hasn’t been through the process.

Ryan: Still like to keep this on the floor.

Matthew Z: Speak against. I don’t know all the names. Not sure why we’re supporting those members who voted to defund schools. Feels wrong to do blanket endorsement for all of them.

LeRoy Barr: Against amendment. Don’t want to speak against Tiffany, but don’t want to disenfranchise the people in the district who went through the process. There’s a process. We heard her name is going forward.

Anthony Harmon: Rise to speak against the amendment. Trust the process. Don’t want to usurp .

Maritna Meijer: Question of why we are supporting members who are in support of charter schools. Why are we in support?

Anthony Harmon: Should only talk to the amendment at hand.

A delegate then calls question on all matters before the house, before there’s a chance to debate the resolution itself (not just the amendment). A big majority votes in favor of ending debate, but it’s clear from people talking in the room that there isn’t clarity that we’ve just ended debate for the entire resolution.

66% yes. Motion passes..

Mulgrew: Last year was a learning curve for City Council. Some voted for budget cuts, but wanted to do away with them. So it’s up to the committees to do the endorsements. Cuts.

AGENDA ITEM #3 – RESOLUTION ON MOBILIZING UFT MEMBERS FOR ACTION DURING THE WEEK OF EARTH DAY, APRIL 22, 2023 – Endorsed by Ryan Bruckenthal. (Copy available in agenda sent out by LeRoy Barr).

Item 4: Resolution in Opposition to Gov. Hochul’s 2023 Charter School Proposal motivated by Janella Hinds with Ilona Nanay. We know their proposal will be harmful to New York City. Invite to meet up in Bronx on Saturday to continue to rally. Copy available at bottom of minutes here.

Passes.

Quick Summary/Analysis: Big news tonight on healthcare. Mulgrew not only justified our new $100 copays to CityMD, but said if he had the power, he’d make it $400. Not sure teachers and paraprofessionals agree there, but hey, read the minutes and see what you think. Kate Connors had an extremely interesting exchange with Mulgrew over the NY Health Act, where he bizarrely hid behind the need for a reso to support it, despite the UFT DA already having passed such resos twice. No other news on retiree/in-service that you don’t already know if you read this blog. Retiree Advocate and New Action Literature, which was being passed out at the door, is frankly more informative.  Although, I’m sure that for weeks to come, opposition will be unpacking what Mulgrew meant when he said “If I’m not president anymore, it’s up to the next administration.”

On contract, we had an extremely interesting debate. James Cole offered an amendment to a UFT anniversary reso, which would acknowledge the role of ‘striking’ in forming the UFT and push us to seek reforms to the Taylor law. LeRoy Barr made an impassioned plea to keep the Taylor Law as is, because it protects us, drawing much applause from Unity Caucus attendees— misconstruing the proposed amendment in the process, which I’ll get to in a moment. Maggie Joyce, also of Unity, then made the argument that striking is for the privileged—that paraprofessionals, for instance, wouldn’t have the luxury of taking days off to strike. I pointed out that this amendment didn’t ask to repeal the good parts of the Taylor Law, just the draconian anti-strike clause. I also noted that the Taylor Law has hurt us before, such as when we were sent an email from UFT management back in March, 2020, that we shouldn’t take sick days during our final week in the building, because it might be seen as a sickout, losing us a ‘dues checkoff.’ We are hurt by the ‘no strike’ clause of the Taylor Law, without question. I concluded that this amendment doesn’t mean we’re signing off to strike, but that we’re getting very little without a no-strike clause right now, such as 3% raises – the types of things that don’t exactly fire up our members to organize. Why not fight for the right to use one more tactic? I thank Mike Mulgrew for explicitly giving someone the chance to speak out in favor of the amendment, but ultimately far more people were allowed to speak against it. The question was quickly called before others, such as Ed Calamia, could make pro-arguments, and we only got 38%. This is a sad day for our union, but I don’t blame membership, especially those on the phones who couldn’t see the amendment language, as Unity wrongly and fatally misconstrued it.

Otherwise, not too much other news. You can read the minutes for budget, safety, etc. I might add as an aside that some new curriculum initiatives are coming out of the DOE. They take away principal’s choice and give it to the Superintendent. Mulgrew seemed tentatively optimistic, but I’m wondering what this will mean for teacher choice in instructional materials, particularly for math teachers in middle and high schools. That’s all for now – the minutes follow.  

Informal Minutes

President’s Address:

Mulgrew:

Federal: Huge budget:  high need, SWDs, early childhood education. Preschool is not childcare. New spending on ELL. Budget of course probably won’t happen: two proposals: lower deficit by taxing billionaires and corps. You will see education enter political arena, as it’s being weaponized by the other side, while this president just wants it for communities. Especially being weaponized in FL.

State: Thanks everyone for participating in Lobby Day in Albany this Monday. Good time to be there, as budgets put together this week. Both houses rejected Gov.’s proposals on charter schools. They support fully on foundation aid – additional billion dollars in education aid. Teacher center, career and technical, etc got funding. End of pay and pursuit, more money for our healthcare. We didn’t lobby on it, but I’ve been lobbying on it, lunch in schools with certain students not being able to eat lunch. State union has worked with us for universal lunch. Now, until April 1, hopefully this gets done on budget.

City: In the meantime, Mayor is trying to cut funding. Administration keeps acting like maybe we’ll do the class size – maybe not. But this is a law. End of story. We’re going to comply (easy in first few years). Need to be planning on years 3+. It can be done, but requires willing partner. Not an unfunded mandate – it’s completely funded, possibly overfunded.

Safety: Yesterday, not a good day. Crazy shootings outside of schools. Thanks Jeff and other school safety people. Constant what city is going through. A lot of youth gangs across the city, and is becoming an aggressive issue. Our goal is everyone goes to and leaves school without safety issues. Not good if administration tries to hide issues. Will give credit that City is doing drop bys, looking at safety plans, asking if safety meetings are happening, checking in on procedures in case of events like shootings. Please make sure you’re doing your monthly safety meetings. We need to know about safety issues.

Curriculums: Latest update on plan that keeps changing. This union has advocated that every teacher gets a real appropriate curriculum with PD aligned to it, with all necessary supplies ‘supplied.’ That’s how the rest of the country works, was once in NYC too, not now. Chancellor is focusing on K-8 literacy and algebra 7-12. K-12: Superintendents will now decide for district (not principals). 15 districts this year will choose between 3 curriculums: expeditionary, words and wisdom, (name missed). Foundations, Wilson are add-ons that can also be used. We’ve told DOE we’re more than happy to work with them as long as there is actually a calendar of PD created to go with curriculum, along with supplies given. Waiting for their answer. Maybe through teacher centers? Not doing unless we have discretion to make sure it works for our members. Districts in question are diverse – some have challenges, some don’t, some in middle. Will only be one curriculum offered for algebra, but I don’t know what it is. This will be the first time since I became president that the DOE has told principals they must do something. Principal’s choice is half the problem in our arbitration events. Again, if it meets our criteria… For instance, everyone always gets upset with Teacher’s College – doesn’t meet the definition of a curriculum per our contract. Of course, many people in city are invested in Teacher’s College expanding…maybe for non-educational reasons.

Contract: DC37 in Ratification process. PBA is deeper in negotiations than UFT. There is more value in DC37 pattern than 3%. There’s an equity fund inside of it, for instance. (They have a lot more titles than we do). We’ll wait to see what happens with PBA. In New York, we have a ‘uniform allowance,’ which means uniformed workers get a little more. I don’t want to debate it right now, but I know how I feel about it.

Retiree Healthcare: MLC has voted in Aetna (CONEY). Relationship with our retirees is different. We watch after them; them after us. No program like this exists, but we need to make sure we police it and make sure the implementation goes right. We are completely in the middle of this and on top of it. Daily communications with the company. They do a presentation, we tell them what’s right, wrong, comprehensible, etc. We’ve told retirees not to ask doctor yet, because since it isn’t a plan yet officially, of course none of them are saying they’re in the plan. They will be in the plan. I’m in daily conversations on this. Majority of folks just want to know ‘is my doctor in my plan.’ So yes, they’ll be in the plan or have a billing agreement with Aetna. We’re quite confident we’ll get them all. Our folks in different parts of the country now have much greater access. UFT retirees have more information than anyone else. There’s a lot of information out there I disagree with, it isn’t true. If I’m not president anymore, it’s up to the next administration. We have legal authority over how the plan is implemented and run. Aetna is now saying they have best MAP in country, and we’re saying no – run with us, then yes.

In-Service Healthcare: Some of what we wanted in retiree gave us information for in-service. We want legal authority to make sure plan is correctly implemented in an expedited arbitration with financial penalties if the change isn’t made. We’ve had to change because one company reneged. On in-service, CityMD. We are now increasing the copayment to $100. I would have increased the copay to $400, but we work with the MLC. These hedge fund people reneged on reigning in costs. Average doctor visit is half of what CityMD costs just going in the door. We’re talking $280 and $400 for covid test ($680). Healthcare isn’t free. It’s part of our compensation package and we need to protect it. We’re doing that differently.

Contract: Some technical issues yesterday. Flyer with different things for March, e.g. CAT teams. Yes, there is one day where we want one action, but you also have freedom to other actions. Don’t have to do everything. But, it’s gonna get worse before it gets better. Mayor keeps saying the City is broke. Now it’s, see the banks failed, I was right. We want our Mayor to be successful, but if you play games, we’re going to call you out. A lot of guidance out now for the Grade Ins on the 30^th. No healthcare savings whatsoever, we blew that up. We can work together the right way to do these savings – if we can continue to save money, and we get a 5 year contract, which is a really good contract, we increase the benefits and lower the copays like we did for retirees. If we can get all this done and focus healthcare issues on the national level, that would be good.

Banks: Our pensions are fine. We have a very small liability, but our pensions are fine. They’re doing phenomenally well.

Secretary’s Report:

LeRoy Barr: Happy birthday to UFT tomorrow, 3/16. On March 25^th, we have the paraprofessional luncheon. Please come in to support that – at Hilton. Reach out to the paras at your schools, make sure they sign up. Early Childhood Conference, April 1^st from 8:30 to 3:00 PM right here at UFT headquarters. Social workers appreciation week was last week. CTE conference last week, appreciate what they do. Guidance counselors had a luncheon on Saturday – thank you. College fair on Monday at Bronx UFT (3/20).

Questions:

Jennifer Brown (CL at Brownsville Academy HS): January, 28^th, Emergency SLT meeting for merger with us and another, due to declining enrollment. Been here before. Real estate issues. Often no plans for older students. Able with the Union’s help, became a successful school. Never been on the state list. Over the last two months, we’ve mobilized at PEP. So it will become a co-location not a merger. Thanks President Mulgrew and leadership for always helping transfer schools. Fight not over. If enrollment doesn’t rise, we are still at risk. Amount of space also not equitable. So question is: can the allocation be changed if the population continues to grow and can we challenge their building plan?

Mulgrew: Allocation can certainly be changed. Your school should be looked at by state.

Lina D.: Curriculum. You say the schools are supposed to give the training with the curriculum. But after COVID, admin is sending a DOE link, ‘teach Hub.’

Mulgrew: Teachhub is not a curriculum – it’s a resource guide. Curriculum is a resource guide. Covers material, has pacing, has standards that must be met. Should be working with district consultation now. Make this a part of your district leadership teams. Teachhub is not curriculum.

Kate Connors (D25, delegate): Last week on Brian Lehrer show, New York Health Act discussion. Discussed how good it was economically, and how it could be good for labor. Hasn’t had the chance to meet with UFT. Will you commit to reaching out to Sen. Rivera?

Mulgrew: When he makes the amendments. We supported him greatly. But we have disagreed that it is cost neutral. The only people who say it is cost neutral are the people who want it. If it was cost neutral, of course we’d go with it.

Kate Connors: Link on website is from a hedge fund, pro privatization. So you aren’t committing?

Mulgrew: Here we go. Not committing until amendments are made.  We will not move forward on legislation unless DA says the homework is done.

Connors: We did, twice.

Mulgrew: Not until the DA passes another reso…

Name Missed: Can teachers be disciplined for not putting up student work on bulletin board? It goes against privacy training.

Mulgrew: We’d LOVE for them to bring that to arbitration.

Name Missed: Question about the Regents. Told by principal that a student with a failing Regents grade can get them to graduate but it can go against your MOSL.

Mulgrew: We’ll be in touch. Love when administrators make this up.

Motion Period:

Ryan Bruckenthal: Motion for this month’s agenda. ‘Mobilizing UFT Members for Action During Week of Earth Day.’ Drastic improvements are long overdue. Climate change is urgent. Educators are ripe for doing this work. Union has already supported a carbon free and healthy schools campaign. Therefore, be it resolved that the UFT will promote the National Week of Action for Green Schools, April 16-22. A lot of what we can do on this is similar to our CAT work. Resolved that we’ll establish an Environmental Justice Committee. Be it resolved that we’ll coordinate with other unions, and that we want to be fully carbon neutral schools. Seek out funding to make that happen.

Phone: Yes: 567; No: 102 ; Room: yes: 158; no: 25. 85% Yes. Passes (to be on this month’s agenda).

Mulgrew: Our colleagues and Florida can’t even teach about global warming.

Seth Gillman: Next month’s agenda. Substitute Teacher/Paraprofessional Resolutions. We’ve all had issues hiring subs. DOE has told schools they’re unable to nominate if they haven’t used sub-central. But DOEs don’t mandate use of subcentral. Pandemic has given lots of reasons for absences. Inability of schools leads to too many coverages/burnout. Inability to track substitutes leads to illegally taking educators out of their classrooms for subbing. Reso resolves for reforms to hiring process for subs including a hard to staff differential.

Phone: Yes: 569, No : 52; Room: Yes: 182, no: 7 – 93% yes. Passes (next month’s agenda).

Resolutions:

Dave Kazansky rises for Tom Brown to be re-elected to TRS board. Victoria Lee also endorses: mentions 92 Tier 4 improvements, and some new changes to Tier 6. Peter Goodman adds on the phone. 99% approve.

Michael Sill: Honored to support the resolution speaking in favor of UFT’s anniversary. Asks founders of union to stand for a round of applause (standing ovation). 60 years ago, we faced off with the DOE on contract. That had never happened before. 1960 may seem like an abstract concept. Many teachers we meet elsewhere don’t have collective bargaining rights. They might have consultation rights, but can’t do anything on salary/vacation days. Teacher I spoke to makes 30k; at end she’ll make 35k. She pays a premium for healthcare. That’s life without collective bargaining. Our founders looked around them and saw tons of groups, divided by subject, age, ethnic background, vision. They wanted to bring these groups together. They built a whole wing onto the house of labor. Without them, maybe the Florida teacher might have seen my salary and thought I had it bad. These aren’t mythical creatures. Standing ovation.

James Cole: Rise to make an amendment. Adds one whereas about the key role of the strike, without which we couldn’t have formed. Also resolved to fight for right to strike, now illegal. 1960 wasn’t just a vote that brought us together – there was a strike. And in doing so, we were able to win collective bargaining rights. Over the years, those have been codified in law, but with draconian anti-strike clauses. Strikes brought us real raises – not 3%. Currently there are legislators who are working to amend the constitution. We improve our collective bargaining but winning the right to strike.

LeRoy Barr: Rises in opposition. Acknowledges who were here. With respect to amendment, if case where contract was going to go away, would you go on strike? Gives some other examples. There are reasons we would go on strike, break the Taylor Law. This union was built on the strike we had in 1960. If we didn’t ask to get rid of Taylor Law. Without the Taylor Law, we would have lost the contract. Can romanticize going on strike. Understand what you’re asking for – people will go on strike.

Maggie Joyce: Taylor Law protects our contract. Other districts HAVE to go on strike. Chicago went on strike to get what we have. Remember when we were about to go on strike? My husband can support me, but I have paras who support their entire families. A lot of people here live paycheck to paycheck.

Tracy I.?: Do not agree with the amendment. This shows we won’t get the numbers. It makes us look divided. Most of staff is not on board with strike.

Nick Bacon: speaks in favor. This amendment DOESN’T ask to repeal the entire part of the Taylor Law, just the anti-strike clause. We’ve been affected by this clause. We got an email during the beginning of COVID that we had to go in – not take sick days – or we might lose the automatic payment of dues. That’s the Taylor Law. This reso doesn’t mean we’re going to strike – it just asks the UFT to push for our right to be able to do so if we need to. Others have said that we’d strike if issues were big enough, but right now we have the opposite issue – we’re getting so little (from collective bargaining), such as 3% raises, that our members feel the opposite of mobilized to take actions. Let’s join many other unions in this country in simply having one more tool in our union toolkit – the right to strike.

Question called on amendment. Yeses: 271; Nos: 363; Room: yeses: 37; nos: 148. 38% yes, 62% no. Failed.

Reso itself: 87% yes. Passed.