You Could Be Removed (after 2 years) before the Letters in Your File (after 3 years)
New Action opposes the teacher evaluation system just proposed by the Board of Regents, with support from the NYSUT and UFT leaderships.
The proposal would base a significant part of each teacher’s rating, up to 40%, on test scores. We do not believe that even the best test of student achievement can provide an accurate measure of teacher effectiveness. But in New York State, where we know, and our union has repeatedly told us, the tests are broken? Or, in New York City, where the City tests and Acuity tests are even worse? Basing ratings on any tests would be bad enough, but on these?
The proposal would invest even more importance in standardized tests than they already have. There would be pressure on teachers to do additional test prep. There would be pressure on teachers to inflate grades. Principals are already pressured by the poorly named Progress Reports to inflate grades, to play with numbers, to cheat. This proposal would establish that as the norm, would create schools and districts where the test scores and how to inflate them become the common culture. Our children our already over-tested.
The UFT just passed a resolution against extending testing down to K – 2. We should not be giving the state or administrators more reason to test kids, more reason to push teachers to teach what’s on the test rather than teach what the kids really need.
The proposal would change satisfactory and unsatisfactory, S and U, to “ineffective,” “developing,” “effective,” and “highly effective.” Two years in a row of “ineffective” ratings could lead to a 60 day termination process – no matter how senior the teacher, no matter how experienced, no matter whether they have tenure.
Back in January, in the face of similar proposals, made by AFT President Randi Weingarten, Michael Mulgrew wrote:
[these] proposals would require a climate of collaboration and trust that simply does not exist here.
Hundreds of schools have abusive administrators who are making life hell for our members. We have witnessed the drive to harass and get rid of senior teachers. We have witnessed new teachers being pitted against our veterans. The Bloomberg/Klein push to fire last years U-rated teachers and all of our ATRs FIRST is part of the picture. Will these same administrators now be “fair minded? Collaborative? Will they craft a fair “corrective” plan for “ineffective” teachers.
If we, the UFT, fought these changes, and they were forced on us, that would be different. If we brought our strength to bear, and tried to back the Regents down, but did not succeed, that would be different.
We voted for the Michael Mulgrew who stood tough on school closings. For the Michael Mulgrew who drew a line in the sand to protect ATRs , who fought school closings, and who stood up to Bloomberg and Klein. We expect nothing less on teacher evaluation and tenure.
Our union must step back and withdraw support from this proposal.
- Say yes to protecting tenure.
- Say no to more testing for kids.
- SAY NO TO RATING TEACHERS BASED ON TESTS!
New Action - UFT 