Posts Tagged 'nycdoe'



Highs and Lows: A Year In Review

Summer has finally arrived. After a ridiculously long school year filled with ups and downs for UFT members, we finally made it. This is a brief, incomplete review of the highs and lows we experienced this past year.

Highs

1. The Fix Tier 6 Campaign (age)

Synopsis: The retirement age to receive an unreduced pension was lowered from 30/63 to 30/58. This shaves five years off retirement for Tier 6 members who started in their late 20s or younger. This will help thousands of UFT members as they get to retire earlier without taking a financial shellacking. To a lesser extent, the age change also helps educators who began their teaching careers at 29-32 years old. Under 30/63, a 29 year old just starting out in the profession would have had to work until 63 to avoid a penalty to their pension contributions. Now they can retire at 59, assuming they didn’t take extended time off at any point. Someone who starts out at 32 could hypothetically retire at 62 (instead of 63) without incurring a hit to their pension. Educators positively impacted by this save their time and their money. Don’t let anybody minimize this. 30/58 is a big win, regardless of how we got there or what other unions have.

2. The Class Size Law

Synopsis: 60% of all NYC schools had to be in compliance with the class size law this past school year. Teachers and students throughout the city are benefitting from more manageable classroom settings, as well as increased engagement through individualized and small group attention.

Beyond the obvious educational advantages that come with the class size mandate is something just as important – job security. Student enrollment is freefalling and shows no signs of stopping, as studies reveal that NYC schools are at risk of losing 150,000 students over the next ten years. Schools are already feeling the pressure. The Citizens Budget Commission announced that, “The number of school-age children enrolled in NYC public schools has fallen by 163,046 between school years 2014-15 and 2023-24.” Reducing class sizes keeps educators out of the jackpot. Without the class size law, we’d likely face mass-excessing throughout the city and possibly even job losses.

3. Foundation Aid Formula

Synopsis: There was a change in the Foundation Aid formula, which will increase the amount of funding for ELLs, homeless, and foster students. As a result, NYC schools are expected to receive nearly $900 million in additional funding. The update to the funding formula was long overdue and certainly helps NYC schools, “where more than 150,000 students experienced homelessness last year and one in every six students is learning English as a new language.” The Foundation Aid formula hadn’t been updated since 2007.

4. Hold Harmless

Synopsis: Hold harmless is an essential school funding policy that began during Covid. Hold harmless ensures that schools maintain their budgets despite shrinking student enrollment. Michael Elsen-Rooney of Chalkbeat explains, “Schools get their budgets in the spring for the coming academic year based on their projected enrollment. Then in the middle of the school year, money is either added or taken away from that initial allocation based on the number of students who actually showed up.” Since 2020, schools have been keeping the money initially allotted to them despite enrollment dropoffs. According to Chancellor Samuels, that trend will continue next school year.

Lows

1. The Fix Tier 6 Campaign (pension contributions)

Synopsis: Pension contribution rates for Tier 6 NYCTRS and NYSTRS members remain unchanged while other Tier 6 workers received slightly reduced pension contributions.

The new pension contribution rates for other Tier 6 members are as follows:

$45,000 and under: 3% (same)

$45,001-$55,000: 3% (down from 3.5%)

$55,001-$75,000: 3% (down from 4.5%)

$75,001-$100,000: 4% (down from 5.75%)

$100,001-$125,000: 5.25% (down from 6%)

$125,001 and up: 5.75% (down from 6%)

The money saved doesn’t amount to much (although members making between $55,001-$100,000 benefit decently), but it doesn’t bode well that we weren’t included in the contribution decrease. Tier 6 contribution rates are astronomical. Tier 6 educators conservatively contribute $150,000 more towards pension contributions over the course of our careers than early Tier 4 members. And in many cases, that figure is modest. Imagine how much that comes out to if Tier 6 members had the chance to invest that money over the course of their careers. To be clear, this is not a knock on Tier 4 members. They deserve what they have. But it needs to be equalized. When you factor in investment opportunities, the difference could reach high six digits/low seven digits per member by the time we retire. More than half of active educators are in Tier 6.

2. The Class Size Law

Synopsis: You may be noticing a pattern. A little good, a little bad. Although the class size law has helped us immensely, it has been extended two years. 80 percent of classes throughout the city were supposed to be in compliance with the mandate next year, followed by 100 percent in 2027-28. Instead, only 70 percent of classes will have to be in compliance next year, followed by 80 percent in 2027-28, 90 percent in 2028-29, and 100 percent by 2029-2030, not counting exemptions. The delay means hundreds of millions less in funding for NYC schools and thousands fewer new teacher hires than originally promised for the upcoming school year.

3. The Federal Tax-Credit Scholarship

Synopsis: Governor Hochul has expressed her support for the federal tax-credit scholarship, a school voucher program that will rob tax money from public schools and public works in order to fund private schools. This is a blatant, anti-public school initiative that could have serious consequences. In January, Chalkbeat published an alarming piece about the school choice tax credit program. Chalkbeat reporter Lily Altavena explains, “families can donate up to $1,700 to scholarship-granting organizations and receive an equivalent tax credit back.” Allowing families to receive tax credit to financially benefit private schools reduces the amount of tax dollars that go into our communities. In fact, in 2022, Kentucky’s Supreme Court “ruled that Kentucky’s tax credit scholarship program is unconstitutional.” As Peter Greene explains, “In a tax credit scholarship program, corporations or individuals contribute money to a ‘scholarship’ fund that will pay part of some student’s tuition at a private school. The state then counts that contribution towards taxes.” In other words, tax dollars are reallocated to private schools instead of going to public schools, projects, and programs that would otherwise support our communities. You can learn more and take action to stop this attack on public schools here.

4. Abusive Administrators

Synopsis: Self-explanatory. Although we do not have data to provide us with exact numbers, the anecdotal evidence is overwhelming. If social media is any indication, educators throughout NYC are facing retaliatory, unfair, and unreasonable administrators. Granted, social media is more conducive to people who tend to vent rather than regale us with stories about glorious, flawlessly run schools with competent and compassionate leadership, so it may not be the most accurate measure, but it’s hard to ignore when tales of abusive admin continue to run rampant. There doesn’t seem to be much in the way of checks and balances. Under state law, untenured employees are considered “at will” and can be discontinued at the drop of a hat, which has been weaponized by school administrators. Principals have entirely too much power, running their schools like fiefdoms rather than academic institutions where educators are valued and treated as professionals.

It’s been a mixed bag of a year. These are just some of the broad strokes. Anyone that says everything is great isn’t telling the whole story. On the flip side, those who claim all hope is lost and that the sky is falling are being equally disingenuous. The upcoming school year will be very telling as to the future of our union. In addition to everything mentioned above, our contract expires in November 2027 and we’re still waiting on the paraprofessional RESPECT check. We must continue to work together and support each other so we can collectively improve our lot, both within our schools and in the broader union landscape. Ascension or descension. The choice is ours.

Be It Resolved… That the UFT Delegate Assembly Vote on More Resolutions

The Delegate Assembly (DA) holds monthly meetings (October-June) in which elected chapter leaders and delegates throughout the city discuss union issues. The DA is often referred to as the highest decision-making body in the UFT. At the end of each meeting, the DA votes on resolutions that usually directly impact our union. These resolutions are proposals that often center around topics such as our working conditions, political endorsements, legislative priorities, supporting social issues and other unions, and healthcare, just to name a few. The resolution period is, for all intents and purposes, when the work of the DA is supposed to get done. If the DA votes to support a resolution, that resolution is supposed to become the official stance and policy of the UFT.

The DA hit the ground running this year, voting on eight resolutions in October (one of which was deemed moot) and an additional five in November. Over the next seven months, we voted on a total of ten resolutions, only voting on one most of the time. The number of resolutions voted on by month this school year is as follows:

October – 8 (1 moot)

November – 5

December – 2

January – 2

February – 1

March – 1

April – 1

May – 1

June – 2

The massive dip since November is problematic. Many vital resolutions have been left to languish since the DA only voted on ten since December. One proposed resolution that we were unable to vote on calls for the DOE to respond to low survey scores, implement improvement plans, and enforce ethical administration of our annual school surveys. Year after year, school staff fill out these surveys, yet nothing happens to help struggling schools and chapters with subpar leadership. Imagine if our union was able to successfully convince the DOE to get involved and mediate or otherwise try to mend problems within our schools based on the annual school survey results. Members would not only feel more empowered since their voices would be heard, but perhaps some of those seemingly impossible-to-solve issues would be remedied, or at least negotiated to the point where they become tolerable.

A different resolution sought to urge the DOE and school construction to prioritize and allocate resources to schools in need of adequate Wi-Fi bandwidth, an issue many of us grapple with on a regular basis.

Another resolution proposed an adjustment to staffing in 3K and Pre-K classrooms, advocating for there to be at least two adults in every 3K and Pre-K classroom, which would greatly benefit early childhood educators and students.

There’s a resolution currently sitting ninth in the queue (not kidding) demanding a more legitimate role for educators and families who serve on C-30 committees. As we all know, the C-30 process is a complete farce and waste of time. The principal (or superintendent) hires whoever they want, regardless of the input given by the rest of the committee. The C-30 process badly needs a remodel. At this pace, we’ll never have the opportunity to push this proposal forward.

A resolution seeking human oversight and accountability regarding AI in schools – an issue that becomes more important by the second – is currently last in a long line of its lingering siblings. Alas, we wait.

There’s more, but you get the point. Thirteen resolutions untouched and ignored. Many have been sitting there for months. It’s not just about the resolutions that have been left hanging, either. Think about the ones that are never even brought up during the motion period because people are dissuaded from proposing a resolution to the following month’s agenda when they see there are a dozen others ahead of theirs.

We need to vote on more resolutions moving forward. Allotting a specific amount of time to tackle resolutions every month might help. Occasionally holding a bonus DA meeting when resolutions get badly backlogged may be another possible solution. Someone once suggested decoupling the resolution period from the President’s Report and holding multiple meetings each month, allowing us more time to vote. Whatever the solution(s) may be, we need to prioritize voting on as many resolutions as possible in the future.

UFT Town Hall Minutes – June 3, 2026 (Class Size Law extension, differential payment stipulations, exemptions, etc.)

Editor’s Note: Most of the information about who will qualify for the differential pay is towards the bottom in the Q&A section. Educators will receive differential pay if their class(es) are not in compliance and their school has an exemption. The amount of differential pay one receives will be based on time spent teaching oversized classes. If your entire schedule is oversized, you will receive the entire differential. If you teach two classes that are oversized, the differential will be prorated. Differential pay will be split into two payments – in March and August.

You can read the full minutes below…

Mulgrew: Agreement between UFT and the City.

Class Size law passed in 2022. This is the 67th year our union has worked on the class size issue of NYC. We have the law. We need to protect this law and ensure educators are treated fairly while this law is being implemented. When we finish implementing the initial phase of the law – which is full compliance – this law lives forever.

Three entities: DOE NYC, UFT, CSA. Each has a legal right in regards to decision making inside the law. We didn’t want class size plans coming from the DOE. Schools need to make the decisions.

We’re in year 4 of the class size law. We’ve achieved 60%. UFT and CSA said schools have to do the plans, not the DOE. DOE always screws up. Schools thought they weren’t going to get the money. Schools were skittish about submitting anything. More than 700 schools submitted plans and the majority of them were approved. Money sent to those schools to hire teachers. Money will come every year now. Will not disappear.

Mayor and previous administration did not want the class size law.

When the law was passed originally, the City was already almost at 40%. Some schools prefer smaller class sizes.

Our class size committee, working with DOE and CSA, looked at everything. We have no capital plan in place. Not enough space to get to 80%. Also no recruitment in place, so can’t get to 80%. Had to figure out how to protect the law. Will not allow anyone to say the law is impossible. We now know we don’t need as much construction as what the City originally claimed. Need less than half of what the City originally claimed.

Two major things – construction projects and recruitment – were not planned out by the DOE. School Construction Authority (SCA) does big projects (annexes, new schools, etc.) and School Facilities (smaller projects). DOE did not follow through on getting big projects done that we need to comply with class size law.

DOE did not do anything to help with recruitment.

DOE messed this up, so now we need to detour. Need a capital or building plan. Need an aggressive strategy on how to recruit people into our school system.

City wants to do a lot of exemptions to hit the class size law. We pumped the brakes and said it needs to be done correctly. We need to get this right. Need to protect our school system.

Three types of exemptions: 1) hard to staff (schools have funding but can’t hire); 2) lack of space (approved projects or space limitations being addressed – needs to already be approved, whether in design phase or construction phase); 3) over-enrolled schools.

No such thing as a permanent exemption in the law. They tried to list specialized schools, schools with traditionally high enrollment as exemptions. We said no.

This week we agreed to extend the class size law. Will let it go to 70%, then 80%, 90%, 100% instead of 80% to 100%. The teachers shouldn’t pay the price for the DOE’s failure to not put in a construction plan or because they chose not to have a plan in place to recruit. Many parents and I kept asking about the capital plan over the years. City sat silently, never answered.

NY Post trying to act like we did a shakedown. No. Teachers/classrooms that qualify for an exemption – that means the DOE has the responsibility to fix the situation that allowed the exemption to happen. Flipped it on the DOE. DOE needs to work with us – the capital plan, building and construction, and recruitment.

This differential is just a tool, a tactic to use to make sure the law gets to completion. The big picture – this is about us. We have a responsibility to get this law done. DOE rolls out curriculums with no differentiation. Really aggravates us. DOE central makes a decision and just dumps it on the schools. This is their incompetence. They’re responsible. Now they’re going to pay because they have to get their work done. That’s why the whole differential piece is in place.

Retirees and older teachers sacrificed a lot for this. Money, etc.

A school may only qualify for space exemptions if:

– A real space plan exists

– Design or construction work is already underway

– Schools must still lower class size whenever possible

Schools have a “Blue Book” that shows the space available in their school. UFT went around. All of them were wrong. Not going by that.

Just because school is granted an exemption doesn’t mean they don’t have to get as many classes as possible to meet the class size benchmark.

A school may only qualify for hard to staff exemptions if:

– the school has received funding to lower class size

– the school has actively recruited and attempted to fill the position

– class sizes still remain out of compliance

Every school in the City submitted a plan.

June – principals will receive notice of class size funding. Planning and staffing decisions begin.

Summer – schools review staffing and space needs. DOE recruiting & planning continues

September & October – schools hire additional teachers depending on hiring, funding, and space.

November – DOE issues compliance report. DOE, CSA, & UFT produce a list of exempt classes. This will determine differentials for space and hard-to-staff exemptions. Compliance Report Day is a big day now. Probably comes out around November 15.

March – Eligible teachers will receive the first portion of the differential. The second payment will come in August.

This is a two year agreement. Will monitor implementation and protect the law. Put pressure on DOE to move.

Nobody is taking Foundation Aid out of our school system. We go to court and we win. Mayor is huge supporter of the law. One of the first things he said when he got elected is that “we’re going to get this done.” Chancellor also on board. I know the DOE doesn’t support this law. A lot of work on their behalf. They don’t want to do it.

Over the next two years, we’re going to lock down that capital space plan.

Increase of student-teacher programs in every borough. The schools knew to make a plan to make deal with colleges to recruit. The DOE doesn’t come up with any plan except the Fellows program where we have teachers coming from Iowa, who we love. But can do something with CUNY or SUNY.

This union went on strike in 1967. Big part of that strike was class size. Took us until 2022 to get to a place where we got a law passed. We tried to do it multiple times. Tried through a referendum. Then-mayor pulled it off the ballot because he knew it would pass. Parents want this. We’ll read speculation in media about class size and how we shook down the City for money. It’s silliness. You don’t fight all these years and allow something to get destroyed at the very end. We need a rock solid foundation. Won’t let DOE abuse the exemption process and make a mockery of this law.

Q&A

1. How will the amount of money per person be decided?

MM: Amount of time in class that has qualified and amount of teaching they’ve done in front of it. If you’re in a classroom all day that is not compliant but not exempt, you’ll get full amount. If you’re in that room 2-3 periods per day, you’ll get pro-rated. Same if your class(es) is switched in the middle of the year.

2. What about schools who completed plans for funding but haven’t received it?

MM: I would want someone from the union to contact you to figure out why you did not receive the funding. See if there’s something we can do to amend the application your school put in.

3. Does it matter how over the class is in terms of receiving the full differential?

MM: No, but remember, once it’s over, it’s over. But this will probably happen. Class with exemption but will not be in compliance with the contractual limit for class sizes, which is still locked in. Different than state law. Have had success with getting class sizes under the contractual language. We’ve seen a massive drop in oversized classes.

4. Would both teachers in an ICT classroom get the differential if eligible?

MM: Yes. Simple.

5. For ICT, is 60/40 still going to be the standard?

MM: 60/40 is still the standard. Part of federal and state regulations. Irrelevant of what the number of students is. Must have 60/40. Already have thousands of ICT classes in compliance.

6. Is the differential pensionable?

MM: Yes

7. Will teachers receive pro-rated differentials if class size changes during the year?

MM: Yes, especially the reorganization schools. Lots of high schools reorganize in late January-early February. Also, right before state tests, elementary schools get an influx of children.

8. Is there a limit to how many classes per school can get a differential?

MM: No

9. If there are classrooms who get a differential, will cluster teachers receive it also?

MM: When they’re in a room that is not exempt, they will get part of the differential.

10. This will impact Regents and MOSL scores. How do we compare to schools complying with class size law?

MM: We do pretty well with MOSLs. But it is much easier to teach 22 per class than 32.

11. Why are kindergarten classes not being capped in my school? 25 kids in Kindergarten, 20 in other classes.

MM: Calls on Carl Cambria. The school is doing that to not comply with the law. Doing this to hedge their bets for upper grades. Playing games. Will follow up.

12. Will some teachers in the same school receive the differential while others do not? How will union help prevent admin from picking favorites to receive differential?

MM: Dealing with admin who have ill intent or power trips is something we deal with all the time. People don’t use power correctly and are unfair. I’m not saying the differential or class size law will stop that behavior, but we love to fight with those folks. The process is 70, 80, 90, and then 100%. Everyone will eventually receive the benefit.

13. We were told Gifted & Talented classrooms are exempt from law.

MM: They’re not exempt from the law. Gifted & Talented has been a political hot tamale for 10 years. There is no way anyone gets a permanent exemption. If that means creating more G&T classrooms, then create them. Law does not allow it. You might have the superintendent saying it. Political for them. But for us it’s about compliance with the law. What’s so hard? Stop with the DOE talking about why they can’t do something. The DOE has stopped advancement more than politicians, parents, etc. DOE has fought against class size for 60 years.

14. Are dual language classes following the same class size law and are they eligible for differential?

MM: Absolutely.

15. Will this differential be something I have to apply for in November or come from a compliance report and automatically done for me?

MM: Calls on Cambria. We’ll have agreed upon exemptions in November. That will be list we work off of to see who receives differentials. Schools will receive notice of the classes being exempted and those will be sent to State.

MM: When that notice goes out, CLs should request that from the principal.

CC: We’ll reach out to all schools that are part of the exemption process.

MM: We can revisit this agreement in two years. Class size is a big deal. We know it makes a difference. Not going to rush. Make sure it’ll be done the right way. It will serve the city for decades. Children deserve it. We deserve it. We work in the most challenging school district in the world. This time next year, we’ll be talking about 80%. Next school year we’ll be 70% in compliance.


Learn more about

our UFT Caucus

Content Policy

Content of signed articles and comments represents the opinions of their authors. The views expressed in signed articles are not necessarily the views of New Action/UFT.
Follow New Action – UFT on WordPress.com
October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 415,828 hits