Archive for the 'unions' Category

Is UFT’s New Virtual Instruction Program a Strike-Break Risk?

Teacher unionists everywhere need to be aware of what is going on right now in Youngstown, Ohio. Teachers there are readying to strike, following a breakdown in contract negotiations. They had been offered an offensively low wage increase (2%), to name one of several reasons for the job action.

In return, Youngstown has found an odd way to break the strike. They aren’t hiring anyone new to take the teachers’ place. They’re setting up a virtual learning program, to be overseen only by a small group of administrators and teachers willing to cross the picket line. Edtech, it appears, is all that the City thinks is needed to keep kids learning while waiting for teachers’ strike funds to run out.

Of course, we don’t know if Youngstown’s strategy will work. Many parents in this union-proud town reportedly think sending their kids onto virtual platforms in the middle of a teachers strike is akin to them crossing a picket line. And no parent wants their 8-year old clicking through a computer module when they could be in person, learning from teachers right in front of them.

But, the fact of the matter is that Youngstown has found a way to weaponize Edtech as a strike-breaking tool. And that should give us pause. Because, as part of the 2022-2027 contract, we signed a deal with the DOE to co-produce a city-wide virtual instruction system that very well could make Youngstown’s look comparatively like a CDROM from the 1990s. And lest we forget old political history, Adams had previously stated his willingness to have as many as 400 students in a Zoom class. As nightmarish a scenario as this would be educationally speaking, the City certainly employs more than one non-UFT administrator per every 400 students.

Is it possible that New York would do the same as Youngstown if the UFT were readying to strike? Is it possible that the City might use the very tools we are being tasked to help create in order to break a strike down the road?

Perhaps, yes and perhaps, no. But, if it’s happening in Ohio, the bottom line is it could theoretically happen anywhere. You never know, after all, who will be Mayor 5, 10, or 20 years from now,

As SAG-AFRA fights to keep Hollywood from using AI replicas of actors in their stead, teachers must confront the digital threat to our own livelihoods. The UFT welcomed in the virtual instruction pandora’s box with open arms. It will be on us to use our vague committee powers to make sure what’s happening in Youngstown is never even remotely possible here.

-Nick Bacon, NAC Co-Chair and UFT Executive Board Member

Los Angeles Teachers Get 21% Raises – Without Even Having to Strike

UTLA has announced a tentative deal with the City of Los Angeles that includes 21% in raises over just three years. The signatures are still pending, but I don’t expect a no-vote on this one.

Not only do the raises put our dismal pattern to shame; they aren’t even the only economic gains. There are also special additional pay increases for hard-to-staff titles like nurses ($20,000) and special education teachers ($2,500), among others. Contractual class size reductions, which UFC supports outright but Unity Caucus usually rejects for financial reasons, are also part of the LA deal. So we’re talking about what would be a dream deal in New York. Oh yeah, and did I mention there aren’t any healthcare givebacks either?

The best part? Los Angeles teachers didn’t even have to strike. The City knew they were strike ready, as they had already ‘pre-struck‘ for three days earlier this year in solidarity with SEIU-99. This goes to show that it’s not necessarily striking itself, but even merely showing a willingness and capability to do so, that shocks municipalities into signing good contracts with labor unions.

None of this is a surprise. All the data suggests that it’s the strike threat, and almost entirely the strike threat, which is helping labor make gains right now. It’s why many of us in the left-opposition were so shocked to see LeRoy Barr and other UFT leaders speak out against lobbying to reform the Taylor Law so that we would have the right to strike ourselves.

All this is critical, because the right to strike is in jeopardy right now. The Supreme Court is primed to make a decision that could allow companies to sue labor unions for strike-related losses to their bottom line. It goes without saying, that this would have a massive chilling effect for labor. In this terrifying moment for workers, some members of the opposition are planning to put forward a resolution for today’s DA to join the national fight for the right to strike. Now, whether Mulgrew calls on anyone to actually raise that resolution is another story. But, I hope Unity reverses course and does the right thing. We deserve the right to strike. And we aren’t getting the contract we need without showing the City that UFT leadership plans to seek it out.

Should teachers wear uniforms? Some thoughts on the PBA contract and the uniform pattern.

PBA now has a contract. The details are better than DC37’s, which has led to some questions and confusion amongst rank and file in the UFT. In this post, I analyze some of the details/implications, answering some questions I’ve seen circulating along the way.

  • Beating ‘the pattern.’ I’ll start with the question I’m hearing the most: if police officers beat the pattern, can we? The short answer is no. You see, police officers are grouped under what we call the ‘uniformed professions,’ who effectively get their own pattern. So, while NYFD may benefit from PBA’s negotiation, UFT will not. We’re stuck with the ‘non-uniformed’ or ‘civilian’ pattern, and that sub-inflation embarrassment was set by DC37 without any pushback from UFT leadership. Similarly, police officers will apparently get their retro settled right away – they won’t have to wait for years and years to be ‘made not quite whole,’ as UFT infamously did.
  • The gendered ‘pattern gap.’ The uniformed/civilian distinction sets an incredibly problematic double standard. Pattern bargaining already has the issue of ‘cementing’ old inequalities into eternity. All titles are subject to the same economic increases, so whatever inequalities were there at the beginning of pattern bargaining are doomed to be perpetuated ad infinitum. But the distinction between uniformed/civilian professions only further exacerbates inequalities. By ensuring that salaries even grow at a higher rate amongst male-dominated professions (e.g. police officers and firefighters) compared to female dominated professions (e.g. teachers and paraprofessionals), inequalities between the pay rates of each job actually increase over time.
  • There’s no substitute for real organizing. NYPD officers have a bit of a reputation for ‘stretching’ the Taylor Law and getting away with it. (Think: ‘blue flu’). But, PBA solidly negotiated this contract within the confines of New York public-sector bargaining laws. In other words, they did not strike. And it’s telling that police officers, despite predictably doing better than DC37 in terms of their pattern, still ended up with sub-inflation wage increases. Education workers in Los Angeles on the other hand, who held a three day strike, did beat inflation. So yes, NYPD will get better relative raises than the UFT, but the more militant Local SEIU 99 beat both out by a longshot.

So, yes, teachers and all other ‘civilian’ union members should at least get what ‘uniformed’ workers get. The inequality in our patterns exposes some of the most blatant absurdities of pattern bargaining, and should be immediately abolished. But to truly get what we deserve, we will need to push beyond what even uniformed unions are getting in post-Taylor, New York. To get what we really deserve, we will need to dramatically increase our scope of contract tactics to that of what we are seeing in L.A. and Chicago. It is organizing, and organizing alone, that can beat inflation.


Learn more about

our UFT Caucus

Content Policy

Content of signed articles and comments represents the opinions of their authors. The views expressed in signed articles are not necessarily the views of New Action/UFT.
Follow New Action – UFT on WordPress.com
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Blog Stats

  • 401,256 hits