Archive for the 'UFT Executive Board' Category



Resolution on UFT Elections

(from the New Action leaflet distributed at the May 2013 UFT Delegate Assembly).
For a printable version click: Leaflet 2013 June

Resolution on UFT Elections

Only 18% of our in-service members voted this Spring. We should all be concerned. At the June 3, 2013 exec board meeting New Action introduced a resolution to form a committee to study this and make recommendations. It was amended, and passed, and is before you today:

WHEREAS, in the recently concluded UFT citywide election the total in-service vote dropped by a total vote of 11,434 which represents a decrease of 12% from the 2004 election; and

WHEREAS, the UFT made several efforts to increase membership involvement in the election, including Robo calls and emails to members for the first time, District Representatives working with CL’s to increase the vote; be it

RESOLVED, that the Election Committee conduct a study of the reasons affecting low voter participation and issue a report to the President, Executive Board and Delegate Assembly with recommendations.

… and an amendment

The original resolution called for a new committee with equal representation for the three caucuses that participated in the election. The amended resolution calls instead for the election committee to do the work, since that body already exists. But the election committee only has one member from New Action, and one from MORE. Issues of fairness and representation should lead us to amend the resolved to read:

Election Committee, expanded to include at least 2 members of each caucus, conduct….

 

Notes from the May 6 UFT Exec Board

–       Excessed Teachers at Open Mike
–       UFT taking lead role in MLC demo against Bloomberg
–       Some questions from New Action members
–       Political endorsements
–       Debate on Bangladeshi garment workers resolution
–       2013 Gay Pride March

These are notes, not a full report.

There were four speakers at the open mike, including two excessed teachers (ATRs) – one spoke to ending the combination funding/hiring/transfer/excessing systems that caused the ATR pool to swell. The other spoke against “kidnapping” – the practice where a principal can take an ATR and keep him or her without that teacher’s consent. Michael Mendel spoke about the apparent contradiction (for forced placement or against forced placement). But the “kidnappings” result in temporary, not permanent placements.

During the president’s report, Mulgrew announced that the UFT, as part of the Municipal Labor Council, would be taking the lead role in a June 12 “Fair Contracts for All” demonstration.

Michael Shulman, New Action co-chair, during the question period, asked about ATRs (see separate report). Jonathan Halabi, the other co-chair, brought to the Board his concern that UFT Social Workers are being replaced by private companies are being brought in by the DOE to do their work, and mentioned a list of schools where this has happened. He asked what the UFT is doing, or could do, about this situation. The chair asked for the list. Maria Ramos, in reports from districts, read a thank you letter from some of those affected by the SESIS victory.

The following City Council endorsements were proposed and approved (New Action had been prepared to speak to ensure that Mark Treygor, a teacher, was included; this proved to be unnecessary as not only was Mark endorsed, but Paul Egan compared him to Danny Dromm.)

Borough           Dist      Candidate       Party Affiliation

Manhattan       02       Rosie Mendez              D
Bronx             15        Ritchie Torres             D
Queens                        20        Peter Koo                    D
Queens           22        Costa Constantinides D
Queens                       26        James Van Bramer      D
Queens                       31        Donovan Richards       D
Brooklyn           33        Stephen Levin             D
Brooklyn         35       Laurie Cumbo             D
Brooklyn           39        Brad Lander                 D
Brookly             41        Darlene Mealy            D
Brooklyn         42       Inez Barron                 D
Brooklyn         47       Mark Treygor              D
Staten Island   50       Steven Matteo             R

Sterling Roberson motivated a resolution in “Support of the Labor Rights of Bangladeshi Garment Workers.” The resolution, a response to the factory collapse last month that cost over 400 Bangladeshi workers their lives, called for the AFT, UFT, retailers, and international labor groups to work to improve safety standards and monitoring in Bangladesh. The resolution was generally well received by all members of all caucuses represented on the Board.

However, Abe Levine, a former UFT officer, rose and attempted to add an amendment. It highlighted the plight of US workers, the need for jobs in this country, and the need for free unions. The amendment called on corporations to pull out of countries that produce products for them.

New Action co-chair Michael Shulman took the floor to oppose the amendment. He cited the need for labor solidarity with workers in all countries. The UFT has passed numerous resolutions in support of workers’ struggles in the US as well as with those struggling in oppressive conditions in other countries. The amendment would be myopic and run counterproductive to where the UFT needs to be on international labor solidarity.

UFT Director of Staff Leroy Barr also spoke.  He said that he supporter 99% of what Levine said, but pointed out that it did not have a place with this resolution. He also indicated the amendment needed a thorough discussion at some later date.

The amendment failed, and resolution as whole passed.

There was a reso to support this year’s Gay Pride March, approved with no discussion.

 

by Jonathan Halabi, with Michael Shulman

Teachers in Excess – are we mistaken?

At Monday, May 6, 2013 UFT Executive Board meeting, New Action co-chair Michael Shulman reported that we have received calls from teachers in excess (ATRs) that they have been receiving U ratings for classroom observations from administrators FOR CLASSES IN SUBJECT AREAS THAT THEY ARE NOT LICENSED! New Action asked how prevalent this was and what steps have taken to address this problem.

The chair, Secretary Michael Mendel, responded that the union is aware of this but that there was NO citywide problem.  In fact he stated, ATRs have not received U-ratings for the year. In other words, NO PROBLEM!

New Action has a question for ATRs – are these isolated instances or are the problems related to observations and U-ratings  more widespread?

We’d like to hear from you! Please email us if you have had a problem with classroom observations or other problems with administrators at the schools you have been assigned to.


Learn more about

our UFT Caucus

Content Policy

Content of signed articles and comments represents the opinions of their authors. The views expressed in signed articles are not necessarily the views of New Action/UFT.
Follow New Action – UFT on WordPress.com
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Blog Stats

  • 404,883 hits