Archive Page 24

DA Votes yes to Send out Contract without a Copy: UFT Delegate Assembly – 6-13-2023

Summary/ Analysis: Today, UFT leadership put delegates in a position where they had ‘no choice’ but to vote without seeing a tentative agreement. Otherwise, Mulgrew said, we wouldn’t be able to vote on a contract before September. The PowerPoint had a lot of things that could be good, but we’ve seen PowerPoints miss the fine print before. The DA voted to accept sending out the contract to members for ratification, and I understand why. But, make no mistake: this has put us in a dangerous moment. In 2018, healthcare givebacks were signed into the appendix of a contract (in the form of economic concessions) because of missed ‘fine print.’ It became harder to get a +30 for newer teachers, because fine print was not understood. The list goes on. What won’t we know before we vote this time? And when will the MOA even be on the website? I ended up being the only person allowed to speak against, though many other hands were up, and that paragraph is towards the bottom.

Mulgrew: Welcome to the final DA. You all do so much work. Appreciate the patience with constant changes. We understood going into this that we wanted to get a contract done by the end of the school year, to use the ability to do something significant – remote learning – but only way to do that was to get it done before September. Today is the last day that this decision could be made. If you don’t understand, we ratify our contracts in the schools. Majority of the membership, some exceptions in functionals who have it sent to their houses, who vote in schools. This is what the City was told. Timeline is real – not a tactic/pressure issue. If we wanna ratify, we have to ratify now. If we want the ballots back, they have to go to AAA – not the union. We were working on that  – at 4:00 or 5:00 I didn’t think we’d be having this conversation. I thought we’d be preparing for actions in September and preparing this summer. Twists and turns in negotiations. Didn’t expect phone call at 10:45 PM last night. We worked through the night and the next morning – finished the last piece at 11:00 AM this morning. That last thing that Chancellors Day is permanently remote. So now, exec board and contract committee have voted to send this out to the general membership. What we’re going to do today.

The MOA is done but it hasn’t been signed by the City or us. But as soon as it’s done, it will be made available to the membership. If you don’t believe me – you think I’m a liar, I don’t know what to tell you. We have more agreements than we have ever had in a contract. There’s stuff in here for every title. Almost all our titles have time to do virtual work. There are recognitions that you should have control of what you do with your time. A reconfiguration of the 155 minutes. I received some very interesting questions – if we do not have a work day agreement, there is an agreement that says every non-multi-session school goes to 37.5 minutes of small group instruction after school. That was something we did years – the reason the DOE came to us to come to a workday agreement, let’s just say – schools end up with 12 bus runs instead of 6. Do you understand what that causes for the school system? More than a billion a year. Technically the City can send out the calendar without us, but we tie this to the calendar. So when the DOE sent out the calendar on that Friday afternoon, we made the correct decision to inform you all that we’re going back to 37.5. And I informed the Mayor in person that night. It took them a little while – they thought it sounded nice, until they called the bus people. At the same time, we have a pattern that we’re not crazy about, so how do you get creative? Our members rightfully said to us that they wanted to stop being disrespected. And time. That’s it. So today, I want to lay this out.

LeRoy Barr brings out resolution for tonight to change the DA – 3 resolutions: resolution to send ratification vote to members, second for a summer contingency plan for endorsing candidates, and to extend the virtual DA resolution – the total agenda for today.

Rashad brown rises in support. Members wanna go away knowing things are OK.

Passes.

Mulgrew: look at the clock, and we might have to extend if that’s OK with you, our fault – we started late.

This here is the powerpoint – not going to get through all of it, half a phone book. Wanna be clear, there is not a single concession in it. 80% was done in committee. These are things, that individual titles, it is very important to them. This is really important work. Our goal was to get every title in front of the City. There was training/demands. That led to massive changes in our contract – all positive towards what we believe we need. Mostly about stop the disrespect. Also about doing some work virtually. If you’re a classroom teacher, it’s harder to do if you’re in person. It was very clear when I was in the committee, it was clear. Every single one of you got changes in your time.

As soon as it’s signed, it will be online and you can read the entire thing. I’m sure you will be fascinated by everything we were able to get for all the titles. Money is 3, 3, 3, 3.25, and 3.25 ( per year), so that’s above the other union. The other piece is the retention bonus piece. Ranges from 400 to 1,035 depending on the year. You will receive that as long as you work for DOE – FOREVER. It does not go away. This check will be the same for every title.

Alicea: Pensionable?

Mulgrew: No. It will not be pensionable. If we put pension costs in that, we don’t get the thousand dollars. The rest goes right where it needs to go. But this one was specific. If put in pension, that thousand dollar check would go down to 600.

With the increases, what we go to now is the teacher salary schedule. All of the teachers will now reach 100,000 by 8B after five years. And everyone who worked this year will get a retro. *Shows slide with some specifics for financials.

New pilot workday: 60 min PD on Mondays; 40 mins for OPW; 55 for PE. PE can be done from wherever you want. Right now, if you do a log, that’s fine. Parent engagement will also be added to C6 menu. Parent engagement time can be done when you want.

Other-school-based titles make own schedules, get time to complete administrative tasks, remote.

*Mulgrew realizes powerpoint hasn’t been sent out to people at home, so starts reading out loud on section about non-school-based titles who can now work up to 2 days remotely in some circumstances.

DOE wanted no-pre approved SBOs. Don’t know what that was about. We were like no, we’re not doing this. 60 means we have multiple options now, e.g. to put PD in the morning. For instance, if you start at 9:00, may want to do PD in morning. Also some multi-session versions pre approved for faculty conferences and grade/department meetings.

Parent Teacher Conferences – DOE wanted to leave it to principals for whether to be in person or remote. But we know it’s successful. We see 3x as many parents as we used to. So we’ve locked that down. Parent teacher conferences can take place in school if parent requests at mutual time.

Expanded professional activity menu.

Bereavement changes – can use at any point within 3 months if funeral scheduled later.

Parental Leave – if both parents are UFT members and you’re having a child, you both now get paid family leave.

DOE has agreed that we should have access to clean drinking water and air.

A lot of stuff in contract is when people are in difficult situations – e.g. Injury in the Line of Duty. Medical arbitration.

UFT center to help make CTLE-aligned options, which can be used in PD time during the workday at the school’s per session. We have to build this—most will be based off of new literacy programs—so that up two PD credits can confer CTLE credit.

DOE agrees we need a committee on over-assessment of children.

Now have to give a reason why probation extended. Can no longer give no clue to why. Opens up some of our legal options.

Biggest skillset missing is programming – some work on that.

H-Bank – we now have read only access, so we can help solve things for them.

All the paperwork standards have more rigor than we had before.

Creation of an electronic per session time form.

Due Process and investigations. Things that we asked for – if you have any doubts about my integrity, please.

I give this chancellor credit. There will be two virtual systems. Citywide system – classes will be jointly created. Can enter, after the school day, if get demand during we’ll do it though wouldn’t work. Could be in morning, evening, Saturday, Sunday. No teacher can be forced to do this work. A lot of good stuff here. We see this as a catch up possibility for students who might not graduate. Then there are other students who want to graduate early, so what’s the problem, let them graduate early. Equity portion – a lot of classes that we don’t have teachers doing. Problem is teacher often doesn’t have full schedule this way. All voluntary, posted. We’ll have full time teachers, hybrid teachers working 3, maybe you want to work 1-7. This all has to be worked out, but we’re trying to be as creative as possible. Starts with 25% of high schools next year, then phasing in other schools. We know with elementary it’s more of a challenge because you usually need an adult on the other side. All our work is protected, everything is there. This is very, very interesting. Always love doing something creative in a contract. If we get this right – there’s no major school district in the country doing this. If you’re district 79, you might have 18 sites. So how do you do math in 18 sites?

Student pathways – students do better when tying to their future.

PSAL: Increased number of sessions.

SPED: There will be specific meetings now where you must discuss the school’s compliance. Training session so that principals and teachers do that training together. SEISIS, we’ve been told 2 years from now there will be a new one, they will continue to work with us on this.

SPED professional activities: must prioritize student assessments and co-planning time.

Elementary Schools: Elementary teachers pee too! Same language for middle/high school now, now have same language on 3 in a row. Also, elementary day will end after kids are on the bus. We’re gonna have fun enforcing this one – it will blow minds.

We still have 20 pages to go through, but these are very specific things to titles themselves. There are no givebacks here.

I’ll say this to you today. We’ve had our disagreements with the mayor. But when he realized what we were trying to do, but this morning he was truly happy with the things we got to announce today. He’s happy about every one of our members getting a thousand dollar check. And the chancellor’s vision. So, going to do a question period, then we will do a vote.

Question Period:

George Geiss: Proud member of this negotiating committee. My first question a joke – how do I run to be a CL in a virtual school. For SBO configuration, is it still a 6:20 option?

Carl Cambria: Yes, there are some options that talk about other options, but that’s what you’d be voting for.

George Geiss: Joined negotiating committee – it didn’t make this. But you better bet, I’m voting yes, because no matter what you think – this is a very powerful contract, no matter what caucus you’re in.

Mulgrew: Just reminding everyone it’s the question period.

Zeke Plotkin: just wondering about logistics of SBOs.

Mulgrew: I shut down all SBOs and PROSE votes. If we were going to war, we weren’t going light. A lot of my members were like huh? What we’ll do is this: we will send out the ratification right away, printing right now. Then I will do an online to the chapter leaders. You can proceed with your PROSE and SBO votes, but it’s contingent on ratification of the contract. Don’t want to hold them and make you do in September.

Name missed: Wondering about virtual schooling, how will it be assigned?

Mulgrew: All of it will be done through posting. Schools themselves will have to submit a plan on what they want to do. No crazy stuff happening this year with virtual. We have to guard this program. Virtual learning was done during the pandemic. There was good and bad VL. Public will probably give us a shot on the good learning. We have to guard the integrity of the virtual learning program.

Name Missed: What if a teacher applies for a virtual learning program and it doesn’t work out because it doesn’t work? Do they still have old job?

Mulgrew: Still working that out…at least a year. But have to work out. Think it will be extremely popular.

Steve S (Lehman): Talking to some of my members, and after negotiating committee, was talking to some folks who were skeptical of presentation. We will we get to see MOA? Including appendixes? When?

Mulgrew: Yes…pauses on appendixes….yes….Then on time, says we are still working on some stuff that’s contingent. Right now, I’ve been told that the MOA is done. IT has been sent to the office of labor relations. They will read it, have 3 people reading simultaneously. If choose to, they will sign it, then they’ll send it back to us, and up on the web it goes. Assume that would be done in next 24 hours, but is still OLR.

Beth P: Question is about the calendar and on remote snow days.

Mulgrew: Officially in this contract, will not go into effect unless have calendar agreement. Have informed City about large issue with Jewish, Christian, and Muslim friends—so I think I’m telling you where we are going on this. In emergency shut down, we go to remote. Had 2 last week – not just snow days. This year, wasn’t a lot, but we didn’t expect to see so many days for next year. And remember, we may also have another day – Diwali – we support it.

Question missed.

Kate Konnors: You said MOA would be up in 24 hours?

Mulgrew: hold up – we’d like to have it up – if OLR does, then it will be up. Just got a nod from attorney dealing with them.

Kate Connors: You’re asking us to vote on it before we read it?

Heckling of Kate from UFT staffers.

Mulgrew: We vote to send to members. Last day we can do this. If people don’t want to have the choice because they don’t have an MOA, then vote no. But I’m so proud of this contract.

Kate: Have concerns from last contract – going to Medicare Advantage. Appendix B, do some research.

Mulgrew: will say what I said to someone else, it was all in there, know people like to misrepresent, but everything in MOA. If you feel uncomfortable, just tell them you voted no on their ability to vote on the MOA.

Vote to extend DA another 15 minutes.

Passes with 81%.

Alicea tries to amend but denied.

Carl Cambria (UFT Staffer): Know a lot of you were on the 500 member committee. Has members of that committee stand up – most stand. About a year ago, we started this – for a fair contract now. We have that fair contract, that fair tentative agreement right now. It’s beyond. Each and every committee. One missing piece to this – the word on the button bottom – NOW. We need to do this now. We owe it to our members to get them a fair contract now.

Rashad Brown (UFT Staffer): Michael, I don’t know how the UFT leadership pulls it off again. Thanks many. We see benefits. Number one thing is money? 1k  a year? Never heard of that.

Point of information: what’s the amendment?

Mulgrew: Can’t just yell out motion to amend. Anyone want to speak against?

Danny Rodriguez: Bronx DR (UFT staffer). Don’t normally speak, but feel compelled to say this – we are here because of the negotiating committee and all the actions we have done. We’ve had contract action teams working with our members. Important to share our work. Proud we were part of that. Show our members. Patient.Hope all yes.

Daniel Alicea: first point of order, typically motions we don’t motivate unless sending to next assembly. Clarify rules? We had a motion here, folks started speaking towards it. If there is a motion, there should be for and against. I would like motion to amend.

Mulgrew: there is nothing that says not necessarily for or against. Something we’ve adopted.

Barr: In terms of question about an amendment – that would be out of order, you’re giving leeway to take someone to speak against. We don’t have to acknowledge.

Nick Bacon: Sorry to even be in a position where I have to speak against this, but I’m on the negotiating committee, the executive board, and the DA and have not seen this MOA. We don’t even know when it will be on the website for our members to see. You don’t buy a house based on a PowerPoint the realtor showed you, or a used car based on the PowerPoint your used car salesman showed you. You look at the contract. There were issues with the last PowerPoint – not because anyone was trying to lie, but because it’s hard to see fine print in a PowerPoint. We need to see the fine print before we tell our members this is a deal worth voting yes on. *Around now, being heckled by UFT staffers* It’s OK, I’ve been being heckled all day, mostly by UFT staffers. We’ve also mostly heard from UFT staffers about why we should vote for this contract. They haven’t read the MOA either, and they also don’t have to live with the consequences. Working teachers – and other titles – will have to live with the consequences. We need to know what’s in this contract before we vote on it.

Name missed: will MOA be on the website before vote?

Aqeel Williams (UFT Staffer): Dues paying member (and staffer) – glad to see the stuff on elementary. Trust my leadership. Also as a member of this negotiating committee, we should be proud that we’re doing – and I trust my leadership that I don’t have to see the whole MOA right in front of me.

P. Johnson: Membership is highest governing body. Members will have a chance to vote later. Call to question.

Mulgrew: says can’t motivate and can’t call question.

Geoff Sorkin (UFT Staffer): Proud executive board member and director of the welfare fund and proud to call the question.

Unity members celebrate no debate, clapping.

Yeses: 1,287; nos 285 – online. (Miss room count). Mulgrew: Passes overwhelmingly.

Motion to extend. Yes, press 1;

Hybrid DA:

Name Missed: For this motion. If have to commute, can miss half the DA – worry about parking etc.

Name Missed: as someone coming from Staten Island, thank g-d. First time I could do DAs without having to sacrifice time with my children. Remember us poor forgotten Staten Islanders! Takes forever to get here.

Name missed: speaks for, great way to be a mother and part of this union.

J. Morris: I’m for – misdial.

M. Joyce: Call the question.

Passes.

Summer endorsement process also passes.

A Tentative Agreement without an MOA- 6-13-2023 Executive Board Meeting

Immediately following the 500-member negotiating committee meeting, the Executive Board met at 3:38, with just over 30 minutes to spare before the DA, to go over a contract which had not been made available to us in advance and decide whether to bring it to a vote at the DA.

LeRoy Barr motivates resolution to allow executive board to endorse candidates for city offices during the summer.

Motion passes, with some no votes and abstentions.

Second resolution for DA to have a resolution to send the contract to the members for ratification, the endorsement for city offices, and the hybrid resolution.

Bacon: point of info to make sure this doesn’t mean we’re voting to send the contract to the members for ratification. Confirmed.

Motion passes, with some no votes.

Mulgrew:

  •  Timeline, we have to do now – there are consequences if not, for September. Main pieces of this contract are clear: (1) is the money, basically Dc37 pattern, retention bonus forever that goes up ($400 first year, then over 1k by end of the contract). In the end, this is a thousand dollars to everyone to every title. Same for all titles. About equity. $3000 signing bonus. Structured the contract so that all members see money coming to them. Some specifics outlining the implications of above shown on a slide. By end, starting salary would be 72,349 for teachers Top salary for paras would be 56,761, including all bonuses.
  • Time: new pilot work day.60 minutes PD (down from 80), 40 for OPW (up from 35), 55 for parent engagement (up by 35). This reverts to 37.5 without a calendar agreement. PE to be done remotely, with some regular paperwork to show what you’ve been doing remotely. Does not have to be one 55 minute block. IEP conferences can now be scheduled during OPW. Some pre approved SBOS. School day can end no later than 3:45 PM. Parent teacher conferences remote, which DOE didn’t want. Other school based titles make their own schedules, and get paperwork time in schedule. Did not have that before. Election Day/Chancellor’s Day now definitely remote, not just at DOE discretion. Some non-school based titles can work up to two days remote, assuming they’re rated developing or higher, among other considerations. Elementary schools no longer have to do the 3 in a row. Bereavement time now less strict. Two UFT members can take parental now.
  • Remote Learning: expansion of remote classes after the traditional school day and on weekends. Can be extra work or only work. Can potentially teach some in person and remotely, on voluntary basis. Is for students who want to accelerate or make up credits. About equity. School-based, up to them.
  • Agreement for clean air and water. (laughter).
  • Labor committee RE too many assessments.
  • This all comes out of the committees who did our work.
  • Reasons must be given for extension of probation now. There can no longer be no reason given. Allows us to do other work around on that.
  • DOE reimbursement of destruction of property up from 100 to 500.
  • Special Education committee on compliance issues.
  • PSAL improvements.

As soon as this is done, all of this will go up. We are stuck on time right now. We have a lot of stuff.

Debra Penny: Attendance teachers are being reorganized back to districts – 2 year phase in.

How much time we got? It’ s 4:10 – Jesus. This has to go online. Most of it doesn’t mean much to you, because it’s very title specific.

LeRoy Barr: recommends that we send contract to members.

Melody: of two minds really pleased with some things pay will help many people. I am curious what happened with personal time? Did we push this hard enough? Donation of days? Are we making gains in this area?

MM: They would not move on these issues. They don’t seem to have the heart. On personal time we have asked…the issue we are having is the fact that we are trying to get the data from the state…there was supposed to be a NYS audit…I am trying to get in contact with the comptroller…City brings up costing and would have us give up raises to get personal time…DOE didn’t even want to give the two parents.. …

Melody: More disabled people in the room would make them move

Alex: I have a question: before we send it ot our members on the chapter level, will we see the actual agreement?

MM: the people writing the MOA are still working…it is complete and waiting for signatures…OLR what happens now is that we have done our read we go line by line you can imagine how long this document is…we go line by line and when they sign we sign and send it out

Nick: I am disappointed. Several of us put out a reso to be able to see the MOA in advance. The powerpoint is good but in 2018 there was a powerpoint that left things out. There were things left out. I just want to make this obvious point. I don’t think any of us would sign a mortgage buy a car etc based on a ppt. I know what the argument is, we are not voting on the contract we are voting about whether to send it to the next step. Right now there is no MOA – only a contract at a glance. We have not actually seen an MOA. When we vote, when the DA votes I know this is framed as whether the members get to look at it, ,they will think we approved and read a full document. We don’t know if the contract is good until we see that.

Mulgrew: I’ve told you about misinformation. You know that everything that was in the MOA. So if you keep saying that it’s not there, you’re a big fibber. These are part of the contract – we can’t just say no. Sorry you’re uncomfortable. We don’t have the ability to do a ratification votes unless we do this right here and right now. They’ll have the info.

Ronnie Almonte: A lot of positive stuff that was put forward. My question is what were the concessions and givebacks.

Michael Mulgrew: none. No givebacks. Not one single demand from DOE they wanted that we didn’t was given. If we mutually agreed, that’s fine.

Ronnie Almonte: Second comment here. Glad to see bonuses, the sentiment, but overall there’s still not enough money in this contract. The teacher wage penalty in this state is 13%. Being the biggest teachers local in the state, we should be narrowing that gap. Had a question about MOU, but sounds like it will be coming out?

Mulgrew: Yes.

LeRoy Barr: calls question.

Passes, with UFC votes as no.

UFT Leadership Says No to Strike Readiness; Adds Symbolic Reso to Fight for Lost Calendar – UFT Executive Board Notes, 6-12-2023

Note: Most of tonight’s executive board meeting was an executive session, as is customary for the final executive board meeting of the year. Therefore, I have only reported on that business which was conducted when we were out of session.

Summary: In tonight’s executive board meeting, the last scheduled meeting of the 2022-2023 school year, we heard two resolutions. One dealt with the calendar—specifically with UFT pushing to add two Passover days and Easter Monday to the observed holidays of the school year. The other resolution dealt with strike readiness. The former resolution passed; the latter failed. Let’s analyze:

  • The first resolution, motivated by Mike Schirtzer, successfully confirmed that the UFT would work to get the DOE to get back three days that are traditionally observed. These days are important to observant Jewish and Christian groups, respectively, and especially in the former case will require many to take religious observance days—at considerable financial expense. Meanwhile, even secular workers and workers of other religions take issue with extra days on the calendar when historically they are indeed taken off. UFC had two amendments, one which failed and one which passed.
    •  I motivated the first—failed—amendment, which advocated that UFT support a petition that had already gathered many thousands of signatures from teachers, parents, and community members to have those two Passover days restored. See here and here to see some of the publicity. My rationale for motivating this amendment was that UFT had already failed to get a fair calendar using our traditional methods, and that simply passing a resolution to use those same methods would merely be symbolic. Why not also join and help buttress a successful community-originated method that we haven’t yet tried? You can look at Unity’s arguments against below, but ultimately I think the real reason is that an opposition unionist—Melissa Williams of OT/PTs for a Fair Contract—did the bulk of the organizing.
    • Ilona Nanay motivated the second amendment, which advocated the addition of Eid to the calendar. This amendment passed, as did the resolution itself. There are still more days we should add to the list of course, but it’s a step up that at least the UFT recognized Eid as being worth a calendar fight.
  • The second resolution, brought to the table by the High School Executive Board, was motivated by Ronnie Almonte, and subsequently endorsed by Alex Jallot, myself, and Ed Calamia. We sought—not a strike, which we concede the UFT is not ready for—but rather a strike readiness campaign, so that we could be ready for one if it came to it. Unity spoke against the resolution, with all sorts of outlandish sophistry ranging from ‘we don’t need it, because we already have it,’ to ‘if we really needed to strike, we would just strike,’ etc, etc, etc. These arguments, are of course, absurd. The whole point of strike readiness campaigns is that it takes months to years of preparations for unions to be ready to strike. For a union who hasn’t struck since 1975, and who has publicly spoken against the right for teachers to strike, we’re clearly lacking the infrastructure to strike if we ever need to. That’s something the City knows all too well when it hands us over a 3% pattern, then prevents even a mediocre contract from coming out in time for the next school year. And if we were even ready to strike, we’d have more luck at the bargaining table. On that note, I’ll close by saying I think Lamar Hughes gave the most honest Unity take of the night, when he said that  ‘I am a firm believer that if you hang around the barbershop long enough you will get a cut. If we keep talking strike, members will say “whens the strike.’ I think, this is the truth. Unity fears a strike. We’ve heard Unity be anti-strike enough to know that they fear the idea that, once educated, membership might actually want one. I appreciated Lamar’s argument for its earnestness and lack of sophistry – even though I strongly disagreed. Ultimately, I hope we can get past this Unity anti-strike mentality so antithetical to what unions—especially unions with gains—are about.

Informal notes – minus the session portions—are shown below.

Minutes approved:

Mike Schirtzer: motivates inclusion of Easter Monday and Last Two Days of Passover in the 2023-24 NYC DOE Calendar: Calendar showed DOE doesn’t care about us. As a practicing Jew, this is a problem for me. There’s precedent for Easter Monday. Had the DOE collaborated with us, we would have told them we need these days.

Dave Kazankzky: Want to stand in support of this resolution. Passover is a big holiday – there are many.

Nick Bacon: Support, but motion to amend. Would like a second amendment too but will start with one since it’s 3 lines.

Be it resolved, that in the spirt of collaborating with our community groups, the UFT will publicly support the “Restoration of Passover Days” letter, which is already undersigned by thousands of New Yorkers, including teachers, UFT leaders, parents, and religious leaders.

Here is a copy of the letter with all 4,000+ signatures. The reason I support this amendment is because we’ve already tried negotiating with the DOE It didn’t work, that’s why we have this calendar. Joining with community groups to gain back that time is a strategy that might work. It’s also an opportunity to work with the community—parents, teachers, union leaders, and community members–towards a goal we share.

Michael Sill: Speaks against the amendment, although not particularly strongly, could be convinced otherwise. This is a community issue and we should make it a community issue – but I think there’s a way to do that without adding it to the resolution. Reason why I think this is so is because this is would be our first official response outside of the negotiating committee. We need to smack back against the DOE. Important on religious grounds. If the DOE thinks they can put out a calendar without our approval, they’re going to do it again. Next year, they’re going to do it again. We can’t let them do it. Not familiar with the letter – might be great, but shouldn’t be following on this issue, but leading.

DeShana Barker: Stand against amendment, because the first draft we saw was inclusive of the Christian community. I may be a backsliding Christian, but I’m a Christian. Find this divisive. Original resolution.

Dave Kazanzky: Never met a Jew that likes Bacon more than me. Haven’t seen this letter, it’s bad form to sign onto something against the amendment.

Ilona Nanay: Second amendment – addition of Eid to the amendment. To be inclusive for all religious communities.

Janella Hinds: Favor of the second amendment. I think we should add to the first clause. It is of critical importance that we build on ways that we honor and respect the different parts coming up.

Be it resolved that the UFT will also support the addition of EID to the school calendar. Passes.

First amendment fails.

Resolution itself passes.

Ronnie: This isn’t a resolution about a strike right now. This is a resolution about being prepared if we ever have to strike. Strike should not be carried out haphazardly. Saw Chicago teachers prepare in 2021 took a lot of time convos fundraising trying to get through member concerns about what a strike is what it is not. It has been mentioned we are not ready for a strike. I agree we are not. The only way we get ready is by preparing, I think we are at a moment where we need to start the process. We have not had a strike in decades lack organizational culture. We need to take the lead on this. 1.Hold workshops (like SF) where they educate members about laws around striking. 2.Encourace CL and Delegates to turnkey workshops. 3. Be able to bring those with strike experience here to help mentor us.

Lamar Hughes (opposed) I don’t disagree, however I am a firm believer that if you hang around the barbershop long enough you will get a cut. If we keep talking strike, members will say “whens the strike” Instead of ‘strike’ we should say ‘organized’ we should organize around what a union is and our collective power. If principal sees that you are organized that is more powerful than a strike. If we are truly organized we may not even need strikes.

Adam Shapiro (opposed) I feel like we are already doing that. Teachins grade-ins etc etc actions. It feels good to sign up for the marathon but I have no training. We need to move gradually to build the members up through the actions we have been taking.

Alex (support) We have done much since Feb. I don’t think this resolution opposes anything we have done so far. It strengthens what we have already been doing. Across the nation other teacher unions have put in the months of preparation and it has paid off. This is a chance for us to be educated on what a strike is and why it is important particularly in a city hostile to teachers. We know who the Adams admin is they don’t respect us.

Nick (support) We have come a long way doing many of the CAT strategies, but the City is not bargaining with us in good faith even after we implemented those strategies. That is not to say we won’t win with other strategies, but I think it will help us if the DOE knows we are strike ready. They know we have not had a strike in decades. We need something more specific than what Shapiro proposes. Members need to understand the difference between striking and other actions, need to be prepared for the consequences. This is not about a strike tomorrow, I hope we never need one, but if the DOE saw us preparing for a strike they would fear us more.

Rashad (oppose) our members are not here yet. Financial implications are not included in this plan. We would need to get ready on the financials. When we start using strike like we use the word ‘the’ it desensitizes the management.

Patty Christino: (oppose) Lived through the Bloomberg years, and the members have to be angry. Think we’re underestimating the effects of the strike. How long are the details? Not that wrong. Afraid they’ll hear 2 days pay – once they hear that, it won’t matter. I ask for now that you vote this resolution down.

DeShana Barker: Contract rallies, while successful, we know how difficult it was to get people out. We’re still dealing with the aftermath of COVID and trying to get people in to do things in person. If we have 140,000 members, 10% is 14,000. That’s a lot. Everyone is watching us. We have to be careful – we’ve been dealing with fake news. My sister and I are fighting, I don’t think we expose her. I appreciate Ronnie – last point, we’ve been building muscles with this. Strikes sound nice, but we can’t be the only ones ready to strike.  Table for when time comes.

Sean Rockowitiz: calls question.

Ed Calamia: Requests some leeway so that he is able to speak.

LeRoy Barr: Can I do that in Robert’s Rules?

Ed Calamia: If you say so, then why not? (Laughter – Ed allowed to make point).

Ed Calamia: Everyone has made good points. At a certain points though, if this becomes necessary, if we aren’t prepared, we’re going to get steamrolled. Even if it’s a mustard seed in the earth, we need to make that step.

Fails (Unity votes against, UFC for).

 Full text below:

Resolution to Educate Our Chapters and Communities for Strike Readiness  

Whereas, the City has shown evidence of negotiating in bad faith, releasing a calendar without negotiating with the UFT, and keeping us working for almost a year under an expired contract.

Whereas our current campaign strategy has helped organize our members and awaken the public to our plight, but has left the City unmoved to give us the fair contract we deserve.

Whereas more disruptive tactics such as job actions have been linked to the most dramatic union gains in recent labor history, as also demonstrated by wins by public educator unions in Los Angeles, Oakland, and Woburn; and by private-sector nurses here in New York.

Whereas, while the Taylor Law states “no public employee or employee organization shall engage in a strike,” public-sector unions have successfully defied this prohibition in the past, and have either payed out the specific penalties for job actions (such as the “2 for 1” penalty) or have bypassed them entirely.

Whereas, the UFT had previously gone on strike and won many times, but, in part because of the Taylor Law’s draconian provisions, has not gone on strike since 1975, and as a result has lost much of its infrastructure to be ‘strike ready,’ such that we are not at all ‘strike ready’ today.

Whereas, in the event that further disruption is required to advance negotiations in our favor for this contract or for future contracts, it is essential that we are definitively strike-ready, as only a well-prepared union can win a strike in such a way as to offset or bypass Taylor Law penalties.

Whereas, being convincingly strike ready would increase our bargaining power with the employer, even if we opted not to actually strike. 

Be it resolved, the UFT will organize “strike prep” workshops to educate chapter leaders and delegates on how to organize for strikes and run them, as well as what are the laws around strikes and why we should advocate amending them.

Be it resolved that the UFT will call on chapter leaders and delegates to hold “teach-ins” to turnkey those strike trainings to their chapters. 

Be it resolved that the UFT will coordinate with other teachers’ unions who have had recent successes using job actions to increase their bargaining power.

Be it resolved that the UFT will establish a strike readiness committee to monitor and oversee efforts, and to report on progress to the Executive Board.

Be it resolved that the UFT will coordinate with our allies in the community so that we have the support of parents and residents in the event a strike is ever deemed by the Delegate Assembly to be necessary.

Alex Jallot   Illona Nanay   Ibeth Mejia   Luli Rodriguez     

Ed Calamia   Ronnie Almonte   Nick Bacon


Learn more about

our UFT Caucus

Content Policy

Content of signed articles and comments represents the opinions of their authors. The views expressed in signed articles are not necessarily the views of New Action/UFT.
Follow New Action – UFT on WordPress.com
September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Blog Stats

  • 414,794 hits